<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XR3: 225 mpg hybrid car kit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.makezine.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/</link>
	<description>DIY projects, how-tos, and inspiration from geeks, makers, and hackers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:18:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellisgl.myopenid.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ellisgl.myopenid.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makezineblog.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word &quot;tweaks&quot; was in the &quot;Article&quot;.

My sugguestions
1.) The article says &quot;Fiber glass&quot;, I would change that to carbon fiber.

2.) Get rid of the neat looking rims, and use a cover that would make it a little bit more aerodynamic.

3.) Solar panels on the car to help with recharge.

4.) Get rid of the exterior mirrors and use camera - more aerodynamic advantage

5.) Bring the back further to make a smaller point.

6.) Make a &quot;golf ball&quot; pitted under carriage.

7.) Any part made of Iron or Steal that can be replace with a lighter material would be replaced. Aluminum, Titanium , etc..

The would what I would do first to increase my millage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;tweaks&#8221; was in the &#8220;Article&#8221;.</p>
<p>My sugguestions<br />
1.) The article says &#8220;Fiber glass&#8221;, I would change that to carbon fiber.</p>
<p>2.) Get rid of the neat looking rims, and use a cover that would make it a little bit more aerodynamic.</p>
<p>3.) Solar panels on the car to help with recharge.</p>
<p>4.) Get rid of the exterior mirrors and use camera &#8211; more aerodynamic advantage</p>
<p>5.) Bring the back further to make a smaller point.</p>
<p>6.) Make a &#8220;golf ball&#8221; pitted under carriage.</p>
<p>7.) Any part made of Iron or Steal that can be replace with a lighter material would be replaced. Aluminum, Titanium , etc..</p>
<p>The would what I would do first to increase my millage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hammerthumb</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hammerthumb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makezineblog.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

With regards to #2 would covering the wheels cause issues with brake cooling?

With regards to #7 carbon fiber can replace a lot of the steel in a vehicle. There is a question in my mind about safety. Steel will bend and twist in an impact. Carbon fiber will de-laminate and shatter. When properly designed both do well at converting the impact energy to heat before complete failure. However, in a non-racing environment I wonder about the real world efficacy of the carbon fiber to protect the occupants who are not wearing Nomex suits, helmets and 5 point harnesses. Bring on the crash test dummies I say!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>With regards to #2 would covering the wheels cause issues with brake cooling?</p>
<p>With regards to #7 carbon fiber can replace a lot of the steel in a vehicle. There is a question in my mind about safety. Steel will bend and twist in an impact. Carbon fiber will de-laminate and shatter. When properly designed both do well at converting the impact energy to heat before complete failure. However, in a non-racing environment I wonder about the real world efficacy of the carbon fiber to protect the occupants who are not wearing Nomex suits, helmets and 5 point harnesses. Bring on the crash test dummies I say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellisgl.myopenid.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ellisgl.myopenid.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makezineblog.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could also use ceramic break pads, with a rotor that is slotted, cross drilled (or dimple drilled) and vented.

Well, if he did it right - i didn&#039;t see if he did do this - you would have a cage of some sort around the cab. The reason I said carbon fiber was to make it a tad bit lighter. Lighter car = less energy to move = MPG boost. Of course it&#039;s probably a lot less of an MPG boost than it would take to justify the cost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could also use ceramic break pads, with a rotor that is slotted, cross drilled (or dimple drilled) and vented.</p>
<p>Well, if he did it right &#8211; i didn&#8217;t see if he did do this &#8211; you would have a cage of some sort around the cab. The reason I said carbon fiber was to make it a tad bit lighter. Lighter car = less energy to move = MPG boost. Of course it&#8217;s probably a lot less of an MPG boost than it would take to justify the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monk</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makezineblog.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have purchased the plans for this, fiberglass is used due to cost.  This is meant to be built in a home garage, so things are kept simple.  Design changes can be made by the builder.


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have purchased the plans for this, fiberglass is used due to cost.  This is meant to be built in a home garage, so things are kept simple.  Design changes can be made by the builder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makezineblog.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/xr3-225-mpg-hybrid-car-ki/#comment-299691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad choice of nomenclature. In the UK the XR3 was Ford&#039;s underpowered, lack-lustre answer to the Golf GTi in the 80s. 

The XR3i was a slight improvement but the term XR3 still conjures up images of reverse baseball-hatted bad boyz.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad choice of nomenclature. In the UK the XR3 was Ford&#8217;s underpowered, lack-lustre answer to the Golf GTi in the 80s. </p>
<p>The XR3i was a slight improvement but the term XR3 still conjures up images of reverse baseball-hatted bad boyz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
