This looks more like it was for the sake of design than actual accessibility. I have one of the Blind Man’s Pyraminx and consider it to be much nicer. It uses unique textures for each side instead of brail. Also, the sides are still colored for sighted users. Have a look at the following link.
Visually, the all-white cube with bumps is appealing to the sighted, but (as a commenter on Boing Boing pointed out) from a purely functional point of view, if the faces were still colored, the cube would be usable in both tactile and the familiar visual mode. And your “unique textures” idea seems like it would work just as well, or better, and be easier to manufacture than the braille version.
I think it’s pretty clear this design concept is more for art than its stated purpose. To summarize:
- this cube is not very usable – the faces feel too similar
- rotating Braille ends up with different or unreadable letters
- …additionally, not all blind people know Braille
- the most obvious issue: sighted people would not be able to use the cube easily
Here’s my offering, made in 2002 (but posted just now!) which addresses some of these very issues:
In addition, there’s enough information there to easily make your own. Very easily! Like, “a single trip to OSH/Lowe’s” easy. It should be a breeze for Makers!
The directionality of the Braille was addressed in their design. That is the purpose of those little nibs at the bottom of each square. As we both indicated, usability is very suspect as compared to tactile elements.
When the Rubik’s Cube was all the rave people would ask me if I could complete the cube. My answer was frequently that I can complete all sides except for one.
I made a similar modification to my Rubik’s cube when I was a kid. I removed all of the stickers, poked a specific number of holes in each color (ie – one hole in white, two in blue) from back to front and put the stickers back on. The plastic of the stickers was thick enough that poking the holes left a significant bump. This way I was able to do the cube in the dark on long car rides, etc. (Sadly, in the many years since then I have forgotten how to solve all but the top and first row of the cube, which isn’t all that impressive to my kids.)
This looks more like it was for the sake of design than actual accessibility. I have one of the Blind Man’s Pyraminx and consider it to be much nicer. It uses unique textures for each side instead of brail. Also, the sides are still colored for sighted users. Have a look at the following link.
http://www.helm.lu/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=1416
Visually, the all-white cube with bumps is appealing to the sighted, but (as a commenter on Boing Boing pointed out) from a purely functional point of view, if the faces were still colored, the cube would be usable in both tactile and the familiar visual mode. And your “unique textures” idea seems like it would work just as well, or better, and be easier to manufacture than the braille version.
Thanks for the comment and the link!
I think it’s pretty clear this design concept is more for art than its stated purpose. To summarize:
- this cube is not very usable – the faces feel too similar
- rotating Braille ends up with different or unreadable letters
- …additionally, not all blind people know Braille
- the most obvious issue: sighted people would not be able to use the cube easily
Here’s my offering, made in 2002 (but posted just now!) which addresses some of these very issues:
http://www.briandoom.com/2010/03/accessible-cube-puzzle/
In addition, there’s enough information there to easily make your own. Very easily! Like, “a single trip to OSH/Lowe’s” easy. It should be a breeze for Makers!
The directionality of the Braille was addressed in their design. That is the purpose of those little nibs at the bottom of each square. As we both indicated, usability is very suspect as compared to tactile elements.
Thank you! I just blogged it. Please forgive me all the predictable “Doom” jokes. I’m sure you never get that at all…
Cheers-
Sean
Rock on, Sean!
When the Rubik’s Cube was all the rave people would ask me if I could complete the cube. My answer was frequently that I can complete all sides except for one.
Rarely did anyone question that.
I made a similar modification to my Rubik’s cube when I was a kid. I removed all of the stickers, poked a specific number of holes in each color (ie – one hole in white, two in blue) from back to front and put the stickers back on. The plastic of the stickers was thick enough that poking the holes left a significant bump. This way I was able to do the cube in the dark on long car rides, etc. (Sadly, in the many years since then I have forgotten how to solve all but the top and first row of the cube, which isn’t all that impressive to my kids.)
// What's Trending
Raspberry Pi Design Contest
Maker Faire: Day Two
Seventeen Sneaky Secret Hides
10 Things to Connect to Your Raspberry Pi
47 Raspberry Pi Projects to Inspire Your Next Build
I Have a (Puzzling) Dream
Maker Faire: Day One
Animatronic Beaker Puppet Lip-Syncs to Tunes
// What's Shared
A better way to slice a pumpkin
DIY Nerf Darts
In the Maker Shed: Minty Boost USB Charger
100 Dollar Store Organization Ideas for Craft Rooms and Beyond
Mad’s Mouse House
Lace Princess Crowns
I Have a (Puzzling) Dream
Play the Rings of a Tree Trunk Like a Record
// Most Commented
DIY Hacks & How To’s: Get Emergency Power from a Phone Line
Resin Casting: Going from CAD to Engineering-Grade Plastic Parts
Ten Tips for Screws and Screwdrivers
Ten Tips for Better Measurement
Makers on TV: Big Brain Theory
Arduino Announces New Wireless Linux Board
Tool Review: BioLite CampStove
Build a “Boomcase” and Upcycle that Old Suitcase
Trending Topics
Get our Newsletters
About Maker Media
Subscribe
to MAKE!
Get the print and digital versions when you subscribe