<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Near space balloon launch today at Mini Maker Faire North Carolina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.makezine.com/2011/06/18/near-space-balloon-launch-today-at-mini-maker-faire-north-carolina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/06/18/near-space-balloon-launch-today-at-mini-maker-faire-north-carolina/</link>
	<description>DIY projects, how-tos, and inspiration from geeks, makers, and hackers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/06/18/near-space-balloon-launch-today-at-mini-maker-faire-north-carolina/#comment-217275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=100834#comment-217275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The footage I&#039;ve seen with set-ups like this gives you a bit of nausea.  To keep the spinning down, wouldn&#039;t it help to use two balloons next to each other?  Or with a light weight stick holding them apart for even less spinning? 

The payload would have to be tethered so that equal weight is applied.  Any reason this wouldn&#039;t help with image (specially video) stability?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The footage I&#8217;ve seen with set-ups like this gives you a bit of nausea.  To keep the spinning down, wouldn&#8217;t it help to use two balloons next to each other?  Or with a light weight stick holding them apart for even less spinning? </p>
<p>The payload would have to be tethered so that equal weight is applied.  Any reason this wouldn&#8217;t help with image (specially video) stability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/06/18/near-space-balloon-launch-today-at-mini-maker-faire-north-carolina/#comment-217276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=100834#comment-217276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The footage I&#039;ve seen with set-ups like this gives you a bit of nausea.  To keep the spinning down, wouldn&#039;t it help to use two balloons next to each other?  Or with a light weight stick holding them apart for even less spinning? 

The payload would have to be tethered so that equal weight is applied.  Any reason this wouldn&#039;t help with image (specially video) stability?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The footage I&#8217;ve seen with set-ups like this gives you a bit of nausea.  To keep the spinning down, wouldn&#8217;t it help to use two balloons next to each other?  Or with a light weight stick holding them apart for even less spinning? </p>
<p>The payload would have to be tethered so that equal weight is applied.  Any reason this wouldn&#8217;t help with image (specially video) stability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
