<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool Modular Earbuds Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/</link>
	<description>DIY projects, how-tos, and inspiration from geeks, makers, and hackers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:04:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/#comment-220003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=105521#comment-220003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s an idea. Just give the &quot;buds&quot; the ability to be opened, like a hatch door in the back. Then you could simply solder in any wire you want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an idea. Just give the &#8220;buds&#8221; the ability to be opened, like a hatch door in the back. Then you could simply solder in any wire you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/#comment-220004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=105521#comment-220004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s an idea. Just give the &quot;buds&quot; the ability to be opened, like a hatch door in the back. Then you could simply solder in any wire you want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an idea. Just give the &#8220;buds&#8221; the ability to be opened, like a hatch door in the back. Then you could simply solder in any wire you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel B.</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/#comment-220002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=105521#comment-220002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I own a pair of Sleek Audio SA1 headphones, which are rather similar to this design. Wooden phones, replaceable cable. Problem is, their build quality sucks; I&#039;ve been through 3 cables in a year, always fraying in the same place. (The 3.5mm jack.) If IRONBUDS can pull off headphones that are high quality and not terribly ugly, I&#039;ll be interested. Considering that these folks are &quot;manufacturing and design guys&quot;, I&#039;m incredibly surprised to see how ugly and full of failure points the prototypes are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a pair of Sleek Audio SA1 headphones, which are rather similar to this design. Wooden phones, replaceable cable. Problem is, their build quality sucks; I&#8217;ve been through 3 cables in a year, always fraying in the same place. (The 3.5mm jack.) If IRONBUDS can pull off headphones that are high quality and not terribly ugly, I&#8217;ll be interested. Considering that these folks are &#8220;manufacturing and design guys&#8221;, I&#8217;m incredibly surprised to see how ugly and full of failure points the prototypes are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Gray</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/#comment-220001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=105521#comment-220001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modularity means nothing compared to audio quality.  If they are not acoustically better than Senhizer CX880&#039;s they are just a fashon item.

Honestly, I would prefer they make a set of earbuds that replicate the response of a giant set of headphones instead of something pretty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modularity means nothing compared to audio quality.  If they are not acoustically better than Senhizer CX880&#8242;s they are just a fashon item.</p>
<p>Honestly, I would prefer they make a set of earbuds that replicate the response of a giant set of headphones instead of something pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/#comment-219999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=105521#comment-219999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, even more parts to lose!

The ability to replace the driver is a good idea, though. Everything else is only contributing to signal loss from all the connections.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, even more parts to lose!</p>
<p>The ability to replace the driver is a good idea, though. Everything else is only contributing to signal loss from all the connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2011/08/03/cool-modular-earbuds-concept/#comment-220000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=105521#comment-220000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, even more parts to lose!

The ability to replace the driver is a good idea, though. Everything else is only contributing to signal loss from all the connections.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, even more parts to lose!</p>
<p>The ability to replace the driver is a good idea, though. Everything else is only contributing to signal loss from all the connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
