<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monkey Hacking on Weekend Projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.makezine.com/2012/10/05/monkey-hacking-on-weekend-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2012/10/05/monkey-hacking-on-weekend-projects/</link>
	<description>DIY projects, how-tos, and inspiration from geeks, makers, and hackers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trkemp</title>
		<link>http://blog.makezine.com/2012/10/05/monkey-hacking-on-weekend-projects/#comment-738122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trkemp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.makezine.com/?p=243329#comment-738122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting idea for a project. I&#039;ve designed equipment to try to influence animal behavior and it&#039;s never straightforward. I don&#039;t know how well this will work to scare off cats but it&#039;s clever concept.

As is the case with a lot of the designs I see here, I don&#039;t understand why it has a microcontroller in it. Using a 556 timer (dual 555) could have provided exactly the same functionality in a much more compact, inexpensive and simple design.

As an electrical engineer who is primarily focused on embedded software I tend to be biased toward using microcontrollers wherever they are beneficial, but in a case like this it is obvious overkill. If you&#039;d used a cheap 8-pin micro with an internal oscillator in place of a 556, I&#039;d probably like it, but using a $30 board in place of a $0.50 chip seems wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea for a project. I&#8217;ve designed equipment to try to influence animal behavior and it&#8217;s never straightforward. I don&#8217;t know how well this will work to scare off cats but it&#8217;s clever concept.</p>
<p>As is the case with a lot of the designs I see here, I don&#8217;t understand why it has a microcontroller in it. Using a 556 timer (dual 555) could have provided exactly the same functionality in a much more compact, inexpensive and simple design.</p>
<p>As an electrical engineer who is primarily focused on embedded software I tend to be biased toward using microcontrollers wherever they are beneficial, but in a case like this it is obvious overkill. If you&#8217;d used a cheap 8-pin micro with an internal oscillator in place of a 556, I&#8217;d probably like it, but using a $30 board in place of a $0.50 chip seems wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
