RSS
One is a mechanical genius, the other is a platform game hacker. They decided to join forces and turn a racked car into a simulation. They connected the car's pedals, steering, gearshaft, to the game platform. It's on hydraulics to turn the car in curves, there's a fan to increase the wind when the speed is going up, and they install a small engine to make the sounds. Even the gauges work! Link.
Real Virtual Car
One is a mechanical genius, the other is a platform game hacker. They decided to join forces and turn a racked car into a simulation. They connected the car's pedals, steering, gearshaft, to the game platform. It's on hydraulics to turn the car in curves, there's a fan to increase the wind when the speed is going up, and they install a small engine to make the sounds. Even the gauges work! Link.
Posted by Phillip Torrone |
May 9, 2005 03:00 PM
Transportation |
Permalink
| Comments (1)
| Email This |
| Digg this!
Recent Entries
- CRAFT weekly recap
- 8-bit touch-sensitive handheld
- Cigar box music player
- The 'bike tree', an automatic storage system for cycles, can hold up to 6,000 bikes
- Building a folding table
- Maker Shed weekly wrap-up
- The Chumby has landed!
- Brainwave sofa by Unfold & Lucas Maassen
- Full MIDI drumset with Guitar Hero and Rock Band drums
- Hole punched art
Comments
Oldest comments listed first.
Leave a comment
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)
this is a very impresive make.
It reminds me of the Namco Ridge Racer Full Scale arcade machine - that was cool - a real Mazda MX5 (Miata in the US) parked in front of a large screen being driven by a Ridge Racer arcade machine. Really hard to play, as the steering was geared to be realistic (i.e. nearly 3 turns lock to lock) rather than like a video game (270 degrees lock to lock).
I would think that this project would play much better - and the fan and engine idea would be a very nice touch
Reply to this comment