RSS
Wow, do you recall the post here on MAKE about 2 months ago? Someone was making furniture (for themselves) out of Fedex boxes, then the next day the site went offline. Turns out there was indeed a cease and desist from Fedex. Here's a pretty scary article about that... Link.
DIY Fedex Furniture Causes FedEx Fits
Wow, do you recall the post here on MAKE about 2 months ago? Someone was making furniture (for themselves) out of Fedex boxes, then the next day the site went offline. Turns out there was indeed a cease and desist from Fedex. Here's a pretty scary article about that... Link.
Posted by Phillip Torrone |
Aug 11, 2005 01:00 PM
Announcements |
Permalink
| Comments (2)
| Email This |
| Digg this!
Recent Entries
- Make: Holiday Gift Guide 2009: Mischief Maker's Gift Guide
- Grounding tips for mixed signal PCBs
- Virgil England's fantasy-land
- Novation Launchpad teardown
- Laptop Etch-a-Sketch via Arduino & Processing
- iPhone macro lens carousel
- New in the Maker Shed: OLLO kits
- BlueSMiRF found in credit card sniffer
- Mystery iPhone musical instrument - World's most expensive ocarina
- Stained glass d20s
Comments
Oldest comments listed first.
Leave a comment
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)
Okay so I am not a lawyer, but I believe that to infringe on the trademark there would have to be a substantial probability of confusion for consumers. Further, I doubt they registered their trademark (or service mark) under the class for furniture. I believe also copyright covers the expression of an idea. I don't see where either applies here. You have not affixed their design or a close arrangement to something in a similar class, but rather used it in making the furniture. When a Fedex employee delivered an empty sealed box to us they weren't near so concerned with employee theft.
Reply to this comment
Okay so I am not a lawyer, but I believe that to infringe on the trademark there would have to be a substantial probability of confusion for consumers. Further, I doubt they registered their trademark (or service mark) under the class for furniture. I believe also copyright covers the expression of an idea. I don't see where either applies here. You have not affixed their design or a close arrangement to something in a similar class, but rather used it in making the furniture. When a Fedex employee delivered an empty sealed box to us they weren't near so concerned with employee theft.
Reply to this comment