RSS
The single chip computer on the site runs the iPic web-server, the world's tiniest implementation of a TCP/IP stack and a HTTP web-server. The chip is a complete micro-computer, and it includes all components of a complete computer on a single tiny micro-chip (this includes the CPU (central processing unit), memory, serial port interface circuitry, and clock oscillator). Link.
IPic - A Match Head Sized Web-Server
The single chip computer on the site runs the iPic web-server, the world's tiniest implementation of a TCP/IP stack and a HTTP web-server. The chip is a complete micro-computer, and it includes all components of a complete computer on a single tiny micro-chip (this includes the CPU (central processing unit), memory, serial port interface circuitry, and clock oscillator). Link.
Posted by Phillip Torrone |
Aug 24, 2005 07:59 AM
Computers |
Permalink
| Comments (2)
| Email This |
| Digg this!
Recent Entries
- CRAFT weekly recap
- 8-bit touch-sensitive handheld
- Cigar box music player
- The 'bike tree', an automatic storage system for cycles, can hold up to 6,000 bikes
- Building a folding table
- Maker Shed weekly wrap-up
- The Chumby has landed!
- Brainwave sofa by Unfold & Lucas Maassen
- Full MIDI drumset with Guitar Hero and Rock Band drums
- Hole punched art
Comments
Oldest comments listed first.
Leave a comment
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)
Too bad it requires some sort of network interface chip to actually server up web pages ( http://www.picoweb.net/faq.html has the smallest web server that doesn't require extra parts). Also, there's a smaller one that someone implemented using an AVR: http://d116.com/ace/ and http://d116.com/ace/ace2.html
Reply to this comment
Cool little devil. I liked the AVR version even better. Thanks LAME!
Does anyone know of a webcam with built in ethernet stack and apache so the cam will plug into the LAN and be accessible over http?
Reply to this comment