Self-destructing coke robot
Recent Entries
- NYC health officials decide to allow beekeeping
- Look, it's Jersey from space!
- Record player built into a record jacket
- Cubely: a new 3D printer?
- SXSW 2010 Web Awards are Thingamagoopy
- Free mail-in scanning electron microscopy promo
- Hacker Helpline, like free office hours for physical computing questions
- MAKE interviews Peter Atwood
- Opening Hardware at Eyebeam
- UK's first Fab Lab opens in Manchester
Comments
Oldest comments listed first.
Leave a comment
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)



































Well, that was a pretentious load of fetid dingo's kidneys.
Proving, yet again, that "art" is whatever the "artist" can get away with.
Reply to this comment
Really, I just feel sorry for the robot. Be nicer to your mechanical friends.
It does a very poor job of saying why Coke's bad, anyway. Orange juice is more acidic, so, it would actually work 'better' (worse) in this demonstration.
Reply to this comment
Wow. What do you expect, any liquid NOT to go through a paper "umbrella"?
Reply to this comment
It's a lot of effort to ge through to get a (weak) point across. Coke is bad for you. So is McDonalds. So id pollutution from driving a car. And don't get me started on lead-selenium solder fumes!
Well. Coke is bad for you if you drink more than what is reasonnable and you turn into a land whale (helped by too much McDonald)
Point is, you should not fault corporation to try to push peoducts down your throat. You should fault the pea brained consumers who decide, willingly, to drink 7 gallons of soda per day on the grounds that people in the commercials all look healthy and under 140 lbs.
Reply to this comment
It would have been more effective if that had done a demonstration using some thing that actually destroys lives, like alcohol.
Reply to this comment
I was going to post about what I think about this. But everyone said what I wanted to say in a more effective and tactful manner.
Reply to this comment