"Infrared Light Against Surveillance Cameras" is an easy to build device that protects you from cameras in public spaces. The focus is to amplify the interaction between "machines" (or light sources) that have been built as surveillance devices. This type of project always seems to re-emerge every few years.
I have been thinking about this same idea for about a year now, but was concerned with the amount of power necessary to get this to work well in daylight against standard surveillance cameras (which are also sensitive to IR light).
Reminds me of a Car & Driver experiment, many years ago, in which they attempted to foil speed-measuring Lasers. They mounted a large driving light on the front of the car, and used a band-pass filter to limit its emissions to the wavelengths used by speed laser guns.
Since light isn't regulated by the government the way microwaves are, it's perfectly legal (as opposed to the blatant illegality of mounting a microwave emitter tuned to police radar bands on your bumper).
I don't remember anyone whining as to how it'd encourage people to speed, though...
I thought I heard somewhere that IRs like TV-b-gones can be hazardous to human eyes during night, because your iris is open wider, as opposed to daylight. could a device like this hurt a passerby? I just want to blind a camera, not my neighbor
Posted by: ehrichweiss on February 20, 2008 at 8:57 AM
MakeFan: if they use an IR filter though then they lose all chances of getting viewable video in low/no light situations, and depending on the wavelength, the filters could be circumvented with IR just on the edge of visible light.
TL: your neighbor's eyes aren't sensitive to infrared light (IR) - that's why it's invisible. The military has been using all kinds of IR-reflective (and absorptive) stuff with IR-emitters for night operations for years with no ill effects.
Just wire up a bunch of IR LEDs to a few resistors and batteries, then poke the LEDs through the front of a knit hat... that basically looks like what they did.
Posted by: Michael on February 20, 2008 at 10:08 AM
@James
The problem with IR and UV light sources damaging your eyes is that they aren't sensitive to it. So if someone shines a bright white light in your eye, your iris shrinks and limits the amount of light in. However, if your iris cannot "see" the light coming in (as is the case in UV and IR light) it won't shrink and you get the full dose of light. Not usually a huge problem with LED's (except for the high flux ones) but think about shining an IR laser into your eye...
I'd love to wear something like that next time I'm in London on the Tube, but it would probably get me shot - or at least arrested and my DNA recorded in a police database with no chance of ever having it removed.
Remember that in these paranoid times, a stunt like this can have consequences even if you pose no real threat to anyone.
Michael: Agreed, you wouldn't want to shine an IR laser (or any other laser!) or UV-emitting LEDs into someone's eyes. That's not what's being described in this Make:, however. And IR LEDs that are bright enough to dazzle a camera in daylight situations would probably be too hot to wear on your head...
Shadyman: looks like 9v batteries - just lick 'em, that'll tell you if they're live or dead!
Wouldn't a passive reflector work as well? Those cameras use IR light to illuminate the target. The light can be reflected back with no battery power required.
Also, I don't think the device shown will provide protection for your profile. A wide reflective strip all around your head would protect you from all angles.
Finally, a stocking cap pulled over the face will protect you from cameras day and night.
Posted by: The Oracle on February 20, 2008 at 7:10 PM
george, you're a fool. I work in a criminal court so I see a lot of footage from these camera. There would be a lot of violent crimes, rapes, etc unsolved (or at least unprosecuted without these cameras).
Posted by: george on February 20, 2008 at 10:25 PM
Of course, how could I forget? The all-seeing, all-powerful state is the best way to keep us safe. Nothing could ever go wrong with that arrangement...
Posted by: anonoooooooo on February 23, 2008 at 11:20 AM
This is rather old, the same method has been shown in a couple of movies as well but not really brought into public attention.
It can be a bad thing but security cameras will become much smarter, I'm sure they can engage a IR filter if its detected.
But untill I have big brother taking a peek through my room I won't bother with this, I would think it will stir up some trouble on the tube.
Just thinking, wonder how many would get this to defy the very reason the cameras have been set: Crime regulation. And it may save your life someday (if you value it, which I don't :P) But hell, I'd want it none the less!
Just thinking, wonder how many would get this to defy the very reason the cameras have been set: Crime regulation. And it may save your life someday (if you value it, which I don't :P) But hell, I'd want it none the less!
Sadly, there's no real proof that cameras prevent/stop crimes. Statistics say it's better to put more cops on the streets than have everyone know they're being watched. Basically, if someone wants to rob/rap/kill you, they'll do it regardless of the camera.
Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Sign up for the Make: Newsletter
Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.
And by publicizing this, how many crimes are you going to facilitate?
Reply to this comment
that's a pretty naive comment. so, by saying the word "chocolate" it means lots of people are going to get fat now, whoops.
Reply to this comment
Also IR leds on your car tags to blind those pesky traffic cameras
Reply to this comment
I have been thinking about this same idea for about a year now, but was concerned with the amount of power necessary to get this to work well in daylight against standard surveillance cameras (which are also sensitive to IR light).
Reply to this comment
Reminds me of a Car & Driver experiment, many years ago, in which they attempted to foil speed-measuring Lasers. They mounted a large driving light on the front of the car, and used a band-pass filter to limit its emissions to the wavelengths used by speed laser guns.
Since light isn't regulated by the government the way microwaves are, it's perfectly legal (as opposed to the blatant illegality of mounting a microwave emitter tuned to police radar bands on your bumper).
I don't remember anyone whining as to how it'd encourage people to speed, though...
Reply to this comment
This could be useful for those "Anonymous" guys during their next Scientology protest. Apparently, the Scientologists like to take pictures of them.
Reply to this comment
All one would need to protect against this is an IR filter in front of the surveillance camera.
Reply to this comment
I thought I heard somewhere that IRs like TV-b-gones can be hazardous to human eyes during night, because your iris is open wider, as opposed to daylight. could a device like this hurt a passerby? I just want to blind a camera, not my neighbor
Reply to this comment
MakeFan: if they use an IR filter though then they lose all chances of getting viewable video in low/no light situations, and depending on the wavelength, the filters could be circumvented with IR just on the edge of visible light.
Reply to this comment
TL: your neighbor's eyes aren't sensitive to infrared light (IR) - that's why it's invisible. The military has been using all kinds of IR-reflective (and absorptive) stuff with IR-emitters for night operations for years with no ill effects.
Reply to this comment
I don't see a link to the plans. Am I missing something or did they take them down?
Reply to this comment
Greg -
Just wire up a bunch of IR LEDs to a few resistors and batteries, then poke the LEDs through the front of a knit hat... that basically looks like what they did.
Reply to this comment
@James
The problem with IR and UV light sources damaging your eyes is that they aren't sensitive to it. So if someone shines a bright white light in your eye, your iris shrinks and limits the amount of light in. However, if your iris cannot "see" the light coming in (as is the case in UV and IR light) it won't shrink and you get the full dose of light. Not usually a huge problem with LED's (except for the high flux ones) but think about shining an IR laser into your eye...
Reply to this comment
Great idea, only problem is... How will you know when the batteries are dead? Add a little visible-light LED hidden in the back there somewhere?
Reply to this comment
I'd love to wear something like that next time I'm in London on the Tube, but it would probably get me shot - or at least arrested and my DNA recorded in a police database with no chance of ever having it removed.
Remember that in these paranoid times, a stunt like this can have consequences even if you pose no real threat to anyone.
Reply to this comment
Michael: Agreed, you wouldn't want to shine an IR laser (or any other laser!) or UV-emitting LEDs into someone's eyes. That's not what's being described in this Make:, however. And IR LEDs that are bright enough to dazzle a camera in daylight situations would probably be too hot to wear on your head...
Shadyman: looks like 9v batteries - just lick 'em, that'll tell you if they're live or dead!
Reply to this comment
just don't wear anything with LEDs in Boston
Reply to this comment
I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf mutes...
Reply to this comment
@Tachikomatic
First thing I thought too. Just need to make a smiley face out of those IR's...
Reply to this comment
@mc
The criminals are on the other side of the camera, and self-defense is a human right.
Reply to this comment
Wouldn't a passive reflector work as well? Those cameras use IR light to illuminate the target. The light can be reflected back with no battery power required.
Also, I don't think the device shown will provide protection for your profile. A wide reflective strip all around your head would protect you from all angles.
Finally, a stocking cap pulled over the face will protect you from cameras day and night.
Reply to this comment
Wow. This is a lot easier than trying to figure out how to get the laser on my head to automatically point at nearby cameras.
Reply to this comment
george, you're a fool. I work in a criminal court so I see a lot of footage from these camera. There would be a lot of violent crimes, rapes, etc unsolved (or at least unprosecuted without these cameras).
Reply to this comment
Of course, how could I forget? The all-seeing, all-powerful state is the best way to keep us safe. Nothing could ever go wrong with that arrangement...
Reply to this comment
I knew those IR leds I bought would be good for something!!
Now, time to go protest human rights in China!!!
Reply to this comment
This is rather old, the same method has been shown in a couple of movies as well but not really brought into public attention.
It can be a bad thing but security cameras will become much smarter, I'm sure they can engage a IR filter if its detected.
But untill I have big brother taking a peek through my room I won't bother with this, I would think it will stir up some trouble on the tube.
Reply to this comment
Just thinking, wonder how many would get this to defy the very reason the cameras have been set: Crime regulation. And it may save your life someday (if you value it, which I don't :P) But hell, I'd want it none the less!
Reply to this comment
Just thinking, wonder how many would get this to defy the very reason the cameras have been set: Crime regulation. And it may save your life someday (if you value it, which I don't :P) But hell, I'd want it none the less!
Reply to this comment
Sadly, there's no real proof that cameras prevent/stop crimes. Statistics say it's better to put more cops on the streets than have everyone know they're being watched. Basically, if someone wants to rob/rap/kill you, they'll do it regardless of the camera.
Reply to this comment