I-Wei thought his SwashBot 2 was cool and all, but had lost some of the character of his original SwashBot. So, he built a third version that combines the mobility of the second with the charm and personality of his first crab bot. To build the body and the leg components, he used an amazing molding material called ShapeLock. Seeing the results definitely makes this something I want to check out. You can mold it very thin and flexible for the body pieces or thick and rigid for functional components like the leg segments.
Crabfu's SwashBot 3, now crabbier
Recent Entries
- Building a folding table
- Maker Shed weekly wrap-up
- The Chumby has landed!
- Brainwave sofa by Unfold & Lucas Maassen
- Full MIDI drumset with Guitar Hero and Rock Band drums
- Hole punched art
- Portable induction accelerator
- Make: Halloween Contest 2009 - WINNERS!
- Telescope camera mod
- The patented 18 button OpenOffice mouse?
Comments
Oldest comments listed first.
Leave a comment
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)































I've been using shapelock for a few years now, it's great stuff. Very reusable, just reheat and reuse.
I toss it into a pyrex with water and nuke it for a few minutes. You need to be patient, no point in overheating it as it doesn't make the process faster, and can result in burns. It doesn't take all that long anyway, just a few minutes.
Anyway, it's lots of fun, machinable, and easy as pie to prototype stuff or solve some problems that need a custom something. I used a bit of it to mount a video cam on my R/C plane. Worked great, and took me about 10 minutes.
Reply to this comment
Stunning work (again!) from Crabfu. I can't decide if I want to see it dressed in a hula skirt, or with a little top hat and cane . . .
Reply to this comment
I created a similar crab:
http://www.scottsbots.com/articles/33.php
Reply to this comment
where can you get shapelock?
Reply to this comment