Origami folding robot will also remove your spleen
This incredible video shows an example of "tele-surgery" techniques with the example of a surgeon remotely controlling robotic arms to fold a penny-size origami crane. Although the precision is pretty amazing, we wonder how much the average citizen will want a robot (even though it is remotely attached to a doctor) poking around inside their intestines.
[via]
Posted by Jonah Brucker-Cohen |
Jun 19, 2008 05:00 AM
Robotics, Science, Telecommunications |
Permalink
| Comments (8)
| Email This |
| Digg this!
Recent Entries
- Googlephone Jailbreak - Remote access gained ...
- CircuitBoardsToGo.com
- The Death Trick automaton
- LED "Art Object" is the new LED throwie
- Submersed Songs: Fish that make music
- Learn about electronics: Relays 101
- Teach Make!
- Robotic fish
- Medical aesthetic footwear
- New soft circuit kits in the maker shed and massive soft electronics roundup
Comments
Oldest comments listed first.
| Posted by: Paul on June 19, 2008 at 6:24 AM |
My understanding is that for some surgerys using tele-robotics, even when the doctor is there in the room, winds up being a great advantage (much like orthroscopic surgery). The example I have heard the most of in this area is that the local hospital is using it for prostate surgery, almost eliminating the problems with impotence that often result otherwise.
If I needed it, I would *rather* have a robotic extension to the doctor, if it meant that I get to still have *my parts* work afterword.
| Posted by: dewan on June 19, 2008 at 9:40 AM |
The advantages of systems like this would be enormous. These devices can be truly sterilized, as opposed to a surgeon's hands, and can be inserted into the patient through very small incisions.
| Posted by: ionymous on June 19, 2008 at 10:08 AM |
Wow! It wasn't until the very end that I realized how small the origami was!
At first I thought the thing was several inches... but it is actually smaller than a penny!
Very cool.
![]() |
Posted by: vivi on June 19, 2008 at 10:48 AM |
Yes at first I thought "how it's still a bit clumsy", but I was surprised by the size of the origami at the end :-)
It also looks very steady, even though it is controlled by a human. There must be some amount of filtering in the process.
![]() |
Posted by: Jeff Duntemann on June 19, 2008 at 2:37 PM |
I had the rare opportunity to sit down and operate the machine that they have at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, back when it was first installed in 2001. I didn't get a lot of time with it, but I was able to steer the waldoes and pick up tiny pieces of wire and thread with their grippers. (Alas, I didn't have enough time--people behind me were waiting in line--to try and tie a knot.)
The advantages to patients are almost incalculable. For heart surgery they make three small incisions and go in between your ribs, rather than use a saw to open up your ribcage. The Mayo surgeons were still working out the details of prostate removal when I tried the machine, but as another commenter said, men will come out of that with a lot more sexual function than they used to.
Although there was no tactile feedback that I knew how to detect, the movement of the waldoes was extremely steady, and there was no latency that I could see. The mechanical engineering in that machine was nothing short of astonishing. By the time most of us will need its services, it will be a whole lot better, and I'm real good with that.
![]() |
Posted by: Jeff Duntemann on June 19, 2008 at 2:40 PM |
I had the rare opportunity to sit down and operate the machine that they have at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, back when it was first installed in 2001. I didn't get a lot of time with it, but I was able to steer the waldoes and pick up tiny pieces of wire and thread with their grippers. (Alas, I didn't have enough time--people behind me were waiting in line--to try and tie a knot.)
The advantages to patients are almost incalculable. For heart surgery they make three small incisions and go in between your ribs, rather than use a saw to open up your ribcage. The Mayo surgeons were still working out the details of prostate removal when I tried the machine, but as another commenter said, men will come out of that with a lot more sexual function than they used to.
Although there was no tactile feedback that I knew how to detect, the movement of the waldoes was extremely steady, and there was no latency that I could see. The mechanical engineering in that device was nothing short of astonishing. By the time most of us will need its services, it will be a whole lot better, and I'm real good with that.
![]() |
Posted by: alandove on June 19, 2008 at 5:11 PM |
At the risk (okay, the certainty) of tooting my own horn, here's a little feature article I wrote recently, covering robotics for a medical magazine: http://www.mdnglive.com/articles/PC_Robots_Everywhere - no subscription required.
What's amazing about medical robots is not this particular unit, but the near-ubiquity of devices like it. This one's been around for nearly a decade, and it's hardly the first medical robot. That honor probably belongs to some anonymous, largely unseen device cranking through samples in a diagnostic lab. For my money, the coolest robot so far is the one that can operate inside an MRI machine (with a multi-Tesla magnetic field). Think about that engineering challenge for a few minutes, then read the article for the answers that have actually worked.
Leave a comment
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)
Features and more @ MAKE!

Stop by the Maker Shed store and check out THE place for open source hardware, Arduino & Arduino accessories, electronic kits, science kits, smart stuff for kids, back issues of MAKE & CRAFT, box sets, books, robots, kits from Japan and more.
Add MAKE to iGoogle - GoogleGoogle.
Add MAKE to your RSS reader - Real simple.
Add MAKE on Twitter.
Add MAKE on FriendFeed & the MAKE room.

Why advertise on MAKE?
Read what folks are saying about us!
Click here to advertise on MAKE!
Makezine authors!
Phillip Torrone
Senior Editor
Tel: 707-827-7311
Twitter / AIM
Gareth Branwyn
Jonah Brucker-Cohen
Collin Cunningham
Marc de Vinck
Kip Kay
Luke Iseman
Patti Schiendelman
Becky Stern
Mike Dixon
Peter Horvath(intern)





