Origami folding robot will also remove your spleen
This incredible video shows an example of "tele-surgery" techniques with the example of a surgeon remotely controlling robotic arms to fold a penny-size origami crane. Although the precision is pretty amazing, we wonder how much the average citizen will want a robot (even though it is remotely attached to a doctor) poking around inside their intestines.
My understanding is that for some surgerys using tele-robotics, even when the doctor is there in the room, winds up being a great advantage (much like orthroscopic surgery). The example I have heard the most of in this area is that the local hospital is using it for prostate surgery, almost eliminating the problems with impotence that often result otherwise.
If I needed it, I would *rather* have a robotic extension to the doctor, if it meant that I get to still have *my parts* work afterword.
The advantages of systems like this would be enormous. These devices can be truly sterilized, as opposed to a surgeon's hands, and can be inserted into the patient through very small incisions.
Wow! It wasn't until the very end that I realized how small the origami was!
At first I thought the thing was several inches... but it is actually smaller than a penny!
Posted by: Jeff Duntemann on June 19, 2008 at 2:37 PM
I had the rare opportunity to sit down and operate the machine that they have at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, back when it was first installed in 2001. I didn't get a lot of time with it, but I was able to steer the waldoes and pick up tiny pieces of wire and thread with their grippers. (Alas, I didn't have enough time--people behind me were waiting in line--to try and tie a knot.)
The advantages to patients are almost incalculable. For heart surgery they make three small incisions and go in between your ribs, rather than use a saw to open up your ribcage. The Mayo surgeons were still working out the details of prostate removal when I tried the machine, but as another commenter said, men will come out of that with a lot more sexual function than they used to.
Although there was no tactile feedback that I knew how to detect, the movement of the waldoes was extremely steady, and there was no latency that I could see. The mechanical engineering in that machine was nothing short of astonishing. By the time most of us will need its services, it will be a whole lot better, and I'm real good with that.
Posted by: Jeff Duntemann on June 19, 2008 at 2:40 PM
I had a chance to sit at the controls...
I had the rare opportunity to sit down and operate the machine that they have at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, back when it was first installed in 2001. I didn't get a lot of time with it, but I was able to steer the waldoes and pick up tiny pieces of wire and thread with their grippers. (Alas, I didn't have enough time--people behind me were waiting in line--to try and tie a knot.)
The advantages to patients are almost incalculable. For heart surgery they make three small incisions and go in between your ribs, rather than use a saw to open up your ribcage. The Mayo surgeons were still working out the details of prostate removal when I tried the machine, but as another commenter said, men will come out of that with a lot more sexual function than they used to.
Although there was no tactile feedback that I knew how to detect, the movement of the waldoes was extremely steady, and there was no latency that I could see. The mechanical engineering in that device was nothing short of astonishing. By the time most of us will need its services, it will be a whole lot better, and I'm real good with that.
At the risk (okay, the certainty) of tooting my own horn, here's a little feature article I wrote recently, covering robotics for a medical magazine: http://www.mdnglive.com/articles/PC_Robots_Everywhere - no subscription required.
What's amazing about medical robots is not this particular unit, but the near-ubiquity of devices like it. This one's been around for nearly a decade, and it's hardly the first medical robot. That honor probably belongs to some anonymous, largely unseen device cranking through samples in a diagnostic lab. For my money, the coolest robot so far is the one that can operate inside an MRI machine (with a multi-Tesla magnetic field). Think about that engineering challenge for a few minutes, then read the article for the answers that have actually worked.
Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Sign up for the Make: Newsletter
Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.
My understanding is that for some surgerys using tele-robotics, even when the doctor is there in the room, winds up being a great advantage (much like orthroscopic surgery). The example I have heard the most of in this area is that the local hospital is using it for prostate surgery, almost eliminating the problems with impotence that often result otherwise.
If I needed it, I would *rather* have a robotic extension to the doctor, if it meant that I get to still have *my parts* work afterword.
Reply to this comment
The advantages of systems like this would be enormous. These devices can be truly sterilized, as opposed to a surgeon's hands, and can be inserted into the patient through very small incisions.
Reply to this comment
Wow! It wasn't until the very end that I realized how small the origami was!
At first I thought the thing was several inches... but it is actually smaller than a penny!
Very cool.
Reply to this comment
Yes at first I thought "how it's still a bit clumsy", but I was surprised by the size of the origami at the end :-)
It also looks very steady, even though it is controlled by a human. There must be some amount of filtering in the process.
Reply to this comment
I had the rare opportunity to sit down and operate the machine that they have at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, back when it was first installed in 2001. I didn't get a lot of time with it, but I was able to steer the waldoes and pick up tiny pieces of wire and thread with their grippers. (Alas, I didn't have enough time--people behind me were waiting in line--to try and tie a knot.)
The advantages to patients are almost incalculable. For heart surgery they make three small incisions and go in between your ribs, rather than use a saw to open up your ribcage. The Mayo surgeons were still working out the details of prostate removal when I tried the machine, but as another commenter said, men will come out of that with a lot more sexual function than they used to.
Although there was no tactile feedback that I knew how to detect, the movement of the waldoes was extremely steady, and there was no latency that I could see. The mechanical engineering in that machine was nothing short of astonishing. By the time most of us will need its services, it will be a whole lot better, and I'm real good with that.
Reply to this comment
I had the rare opportunity to sit down and operate the machine that they have at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, back when it was first installed in 2001. I didn't get a lot of time with it, but I was able to steer the waldoes and pick up tiny pieces of wire and thread with their grippers. (Alas, I didn't have enough time--people behind me were waiting in line--to try and tie a knot.)
The advantages to patients are almost incalculable. For heart surgery they make three small incisions and go in between your ribs, rather than use a saw to open up your ribcage. The Mayo surgeons were still working out the details of prostate removal when I tried the machine, but as another commenter said, men will come out of that with a lot more sexual function than they used to.
Although there was no tactile feedback that I knew how to detect, the movement of the waldoes was extremely steady, and there was no latency that I could see. The mechanical engineering in that device was nothing short of astonishing. By the time most of us will need its services, it will be a whole lot better, and I'm real good with that.
Reply to this comment
That's just beautiful.
Reply to this comment
At the risk (okay, the certainty) of tooting my own horn, here's a little feature article I wrote recently, covering robotics for a medical magazine: http://www.mdnglive.com/articles/PC_Robots_Everywhere - no subscription required.
What's amazing about medical robots is not this particular unit, but the near-ubiquity of devices like it. This one's been around for nearly a decade, and it's hardly the first medical robot. That honor probably belongs to some anonymous, largely unseen device cranking through samples in a diagnostic lab. For my money, the coolest robot so far is the one that can operate inside an MRI machine (with a multi-Tesla magnetic field). Think about that engineering challenge for a few minutes, then read the article for the answers that have actually worked.
Reply to this comment