Emily is not real.

Take a stroll through the uncanny valley with Emily, an impressive example of how far facial animation has progressed -

Previous methods for animating faces have involved putting dots on a face and observing the way the dots move, but Image Metrics analyses facial movements at the level of individual pixels in a video, meaning that the subtlest variations - such as the way the skin creases around the eyes, can be tracked.

"There's always been control systems for different facial movements, but say in the past you had a dial for controlling whether an eye was open or closed, and in one frame you set the eye at 3/4 open, the next 1/2 open etc. This is like achieving that degree of control with much finer movements.

"For instance, you could be controlling the movement in the top 3-4mm of the right side of the smile,"

CGI house Image Metrics has certainly done some amazing work here - but I'm still left with that eerie feeling of faux-humanity. - Lifelike animation heralds new era for computer games [via Neatorama]


Recent Entries

Comments

Oldest comments listed first.

Posted by: thomas veil on August 20, 2008 at 10:28 PM

That's weird, she looks like Natalie Portman.
Nice job though, but IMO there's still a cold vibe on this face.


Posted by: Collin Cunningham on August 20, 2008 at 11:20 PM

wow good call - i couldnt quite place the resemblence.

I wonder how much simply knowing it was fake influenced my "creepy" judgement. If/when CGI persons become commonplace, viewers would likely become more doubting/suspicious of images in media. I could imagine a future fashion trend where people attempt to look/act more artificial intentionally … but I suppose in some ways, that's already taking place :/


Posted by: japroach on August 21, 2008 at 2:12 AM

The quality on the youtube video is just terrible.. Timesonline link is not really any better.

Would be nice to see something high res.


Posted by: Collin Cunningham on August 21, 2008 at 3:29 AM

that's odd, the vimeo version looks like crud as well -
http://vimeo.com/1562801

hmmm … perhaps the illusion breaks down without the proper compression artifacts :)


Posted by: chris on August 21, 2008 at 8:37 AM

yeah, it's still creepy. I think the realism magnifies the little discrepncies like when her mouth moves in odd ways, or the lack of fine-tuned emotions.


Posted by: imvain2 on August 21, 2008 at 10:43 AM

Reminds me of a movie with Al Pacino, called "SimOne (Simone)". I really enjoyed the movie, worth a rent.

But.. If I wouldn't of read that she was fake, I would of thought she the mouth just moved weird when she talked [like Jessica Simpson's mouth when she sings] and that the sound track wasn't in sync with the video.

It is still impressive.


Posted by: Embassy Pro Books on August 26, 2008 at 9:08 AM

Still amazing

Either way it is still amazing how far technology has come. If I watched this without knowing it could have passed for a human easily


Posted by: peter on August 27, 2008 at 1:02 PM

the specular one looks like a clip from batman begins


Leave a comment


Subscribe to MAKE!Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.

$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

Subscribe now


Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!


CRAFT Maker Shed Maker Faire MAKE television
Holiday Gift Guides from MAKE
Gifts for Dads
Science and Chemistry
Gifts Under $20
More guides: Santa Claus Machines, Geek Toys for Grown Up Girls & Boys


Check out all of the episodes of Make: television

Alex Rider Dream Gadget Contest
Make: Science Room

Connect with MAKE

Be a MAKE fan on Facebook MAKE on Facebook
Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE!
MAKE on Twitter MAKE on Twitter
Follow our MAKE tweets!
MAKE Flickr Pool MAKE on Flickr
Join our MAKE Flickr Pool!
    make_tips on Twitter




    Maker SHED

    Advertise here with FM.

    Why advertise on MAKE?
    Read what folks are saying about us!

    Click here to advertise on MAKE!



    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Make: Online authors!

    Gareth BranwynGareth Branwyn
    Senior Editor


    Phillip TorronePhillip Torrone
    Senior Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Becky SternBecky Stern
    Associate Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Marc de VinckMarc de Vinck
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John ParkJohn Park
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Sean RaganSean Ragan
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Matt MetsMatt Mets
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    Dale DoughertyDale Dougherty
    Editor & Publisher
    | Twitter


    Shawn ConnallyShawn Connally
    Managing Editor
    | Twitter


    Goli MohammadiGoli Mohammadi
    Associate Managing Editor

    Kip KayKip Kay
    Weekend Projects
    | AIM | Twitter


    Collin CunninghamCollin Cunningham
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter

    Adam FlahertyAdam Flaherty
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter



    More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)

    Suggest a Site!

    Current Podcast

    itunesdl.gif Weekend Project: Beetlebot Simple robot from your parts bin that avoids obstacles. Thanks go to Jerome Demers for the original article in MAKE, Volume 12. To download the Beetlebot video, click here or subscribe in iTunes. Check out the complete Beetlebot article... More...

    Get the Make: Online sent via email
    Enter your email to receive Make: Online each day:



    MAKE Fascination video series brought to you by Dow

    Make: Education
    MAKE: en Español MAKE: Japan
    Important please read


    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Recent Posts from the Craft: Blog