This "Three Meter Geodynamo" project conducted at the University of Maryland was built to study how planets generate magnetic fields. The rotating sphere attempts to generate a magnetic field from spinning liquid sodium metal. Very impressive project and be sure to check out the construction details at the link below.
Spinning sphere emulates planet's magnetic fields
Recent Entries
- Autonomous micro helicopters
- A Way to See the Wind
- Our Autobot in Odessa
- Arduino prototyping lap desk
- Projects: Failure and mounting a "scratch monkey"
- Battle Symets are GO!
- Screw-in coffin patent issues
- Beginner woodworking project for illusionists?
- Brickarms molds
- LED people remake
Comments
Oldest comments listed first.
Leave a comment
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

































Sodium is easy to melt, but unlike planet cores it is not ferromagnetic (the cores of telluric planets are thought to be made primarily of iron and nickel). Isn't it an essential property regarding how they generate magnetic fields ?
Reply to this comment
As far as we know, the molten iron core of the earth is not ferromagnetic. It's too hot; very probably above the Curie temperature.
It's possible that there's an exotic state of iron or nickel that's ferromagnetic at those pressures and temperatures, but as far as I know, it's thought that the Earth's core is merely an electrical conductor.
The better the electrical conductivity, the easier it is to get a magnetic field for a given size and input power, so we use Sodium, which is the best electrically conducting fluid out there.
It's also cheap and doesn't weigh much compared to other liquid metals.
Reply to this comment
Then somebody sneezes into the sodium and blows up the entire state of Maryland.
Reply to this comment
Did you get Jodie Foster to ride in it, trying to get to Vega?
Reply to this comment
Not yet ;-)
Reply to this comment
I didn't think about the Curie point. Thanks for the answer :-)
Reply to this comment