This "Magnetic Levitation Light Bulb" uses wireless energy transfer to power the floating bulb.The bulb is connected in parallel with a 100nF capacitor and copper wire coil and draws about 0.5 amps of current from the circuit below it. Check out the link below for the details on this interesting hack.
Posted by: Naikrovek on December 9, 2008 at 7:00 AM
FOCUS!
it's a shame that the modern day youtuber doesn't know anything about aspect ratio or how to focus a camera. lack of basic video abilities when posting a video to a video site kinda taints the whole thing with a foggy covering of ignorance, and despite the neat stuff on youtube i'll never really remember any of it because these people won't take 5 minutes to learn how to make a decent video.
Posted by: Only one with eyes on December 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM
Are you kidding? Are you blind in some way or another?
Didnt you see?
I didnt even notice the foggy image because there was a friggin lightbulb levitating, without an apparent superchilled electromagnet, which I thought was needed to accurately make some thing hover. I mean it looks pretty cost effective. Who are these dudes? Ill pay for the camera if they give me just 1% ownership or somethin..
If you do however have some revealing evidence that its a hoax, please tell me. but just ignoring the potentials because of bad video..
Oh, that's pretty awesome. LED Hoverthrowies, anyone?
OHNOES MEDIOCRE CINEMATOGRAPHY ON A LOW-RESOLUTION VIDEO HOSTING SITE WHATEVER WILL WE Dyeah I don't really care because the content is excellent. LED hoverthrowies, anyone?
i want to apologise to Naikrovek for the crappy res. I now realize how bad it really is. I messed it up while reencoding it with ffmpeg i guess. But the second movie is better(should i swap them?).
To the rest of you; Thank you for all the comments.(and MAKE for posting this on their site). If any of you think its a hoax, or want a more detailled expanation, ill be happy to give it to you.
Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Sign up for the Make: Newsletter
Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.
it's a shame that the modern day youtuber doesn't know anything about aspect ratio or how to focus a camera. lack of basic video abilities when posting a video to a video site kinda taints the whole thing with a foggy covering of ignorance, and despite the neat stuff on youtube i'll never really remember any of it because these people won't take 5 minutes to learn how to make a decent video.
Reply to this comment
Are you kidding? Are you blind in some way or another?
Didnt you see?
I didnt even notice the foggy image because there was a friggin lightbulb levitating, without an apparent superchilled electromagnet, which I thought was needed to accurately make some thing hover. I mean it looks pretty cost effective. Who are these dudes? Ill pay for the camera if they give me just 1% ownership or somethin..
If you do however have some revealing evidence that its a hoax, please tell me. but just ignoring the potentials because of bad video..
Reply to this comment
Oh, that's pretty awesome. LED Hoverthrowies, anyone?
OHNOES MEDIOCRE CINEMATOGRAPHY ON A LOW-RESOLUTION VIDEO HOSTING SITE WHATEVER WILL WE Dyeah I don't really care because the content is excellent. LED hoverthrowies, anyone?
Reply to this comment
i want to apologise to Naikrovek for the crappy res. I now realize how bad it really is. I messed it up while reencoding it with ffmpeg i guess. But the second movie is better(should i swap them?).
To the rest of you; Thank you for all the comments.(and MAKE for posting this on their site). If any of you think its a hoax, or want a more detailled expanation, ill be happy to give it to you.
Greets,
Robin
Reply to this comment
The rest of the world would be grateful for plans to build your amazing device!
Reply to this comment