Student replaces wires with antennas to increase iPhone's battery life x 12
Atif Shamin, a student at Carleton University in Canada has figured out a way of reducing a mobile device's power consumption by replacing all of the internal wires and PCBs of a device with an antenna. This enables a wireless connection between a micro-antenna embedded within the circuits of the chip. Pretty cool, now my friend can watch their whole ALF box set without getting up to charge it.
This doesn't make any sense. Only a ridiculous amount of the power budget can be ascribed to the insertion loss of the antenna connections. Either it's a hoax, or it has been explained very badly by the journalists.
The inventor estimates that his module consumes 12x less than the traditional wired transmitter module. How does that translate to 12x battery life? Do you really think the transmitter module consumes the entire battery?
Come on, guys, if you are going to post stuff like this, do a little more work than copying the headlines..
Posted by: Roofus86 on December 23, 2008 at 6:59 AM
People need to stop misquoting this article. He reduced the power consumption of the radio by a power of 12, he did NOT increase the battery life by a power of 12. The reason that claim sounds insane is because it is.
So lemme get this straight:
We're going to replace a good wire that can connect all the components in a device with a wireless module that may fail over time?
Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Sign up for the Make: Newsletter
Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.
This doesn't make any sense. Only a ridiculous amount of the power budget can be ascribed to the insertion loss of the antenna connections. Either it's a hoax, or it has been explained very badly by the journalists.
Reply to this comment
The inventor estimates that his module consumes 12x less than the traditional wired transmitter module. How does that translate to 12x battery life? Do you really think the transmitter module consumes the entire battery?
Come on, guys, if you are going to post stuff like this, do a little more work than copying the headlines..
Reply to this comment
People need to stop misquoting this article. He reduced the power consumption of the radio by a power of 12, he did NOT increase the battery life by a power of 12. The reason that claim sounds insane is because it is.
Reply to this comment
So lemme get this straight:
We're going to replace a good wire that can connect all the components in a device with a wireless module that may fail over time?
Reply to this comment