Make:

You're taking carbon that's trapped in trash and returning it back to the atmosphere? And that's carbon neutral?

What, do they plant a tree every time they go driving?

coughcoughfuckingliarscough

Reply to this comment

Biomass production itself removes Carbon from atmosphere.

Reply to this comment

Would you rather they continue to use carbon that's been trapped in the Earth's crust for however many hojillion years, or carbon that was relatively recently trapped in trash?

Reply to this comment

using trash for fuel is a good idea, but not carbon neutral from my understanding of the def. If the definition is how long the carbon was sequestered then what is the cut off? if it is solid->gas then any combustion is not carbon neutral.

my favorite quote from 2008
"If I see one more corporation declare itself 'green,' I'm going to start burning tires in my backyard"

Reply to this comment

I wonder if the EPA has a rating for dignity.

Reply to this comment

it converts organic matter to a burnable fuel. that is carbon neutral because it releases the same amount of carbon dixoide as the natural decay of previously stated organic matter.

Reply to this comment

ok lets define carbon neutral. biomass releases co2 and methane gas when it decays, when you can burn biomass as a fuel it releases co2 in the same amount as the biomass decaying, hence carbon neutral. do some research before you shoot your mouth off or people might confuse you with a democrat

Reply to this comment