Like many Makers, I got my start taking apart everything I could lay my hands on. Sometimes, however, it takes a good old fashioned cutaway to truly appreciate the complexity of a well engineered device. How the heck do they do this? Can I borrow the tool they used?
More photos at Tokyobling. via notcot
Posted by John Park |
Jan 28, 2009 05:00 PM
Photography |
Permalink
| Comments (13)
| Email This |
| Digg this!
Oldest comments listed first.
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)
Check out more videos from MAKE.
 |
MAKE on Facebook Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE! |
 |
MAKE on Twitter Follow our MAKE tweets! |
 |
MAKE on Flickr Join our MAKE Flickr Pool! |
Gareth Branwyn
Editor-in-Chief
Phillip Torrone
Senior Editor
| Web | Twitter
Becky Stern
Associate Editor
| AIM | Twitter
Marc de Vinck
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
John Park
Contributing Writer
| Twitter
Sean Ragan
Contributing Writer
| Twitter
Matt Mets
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
Dale Dougherty
Editor & Publisher
| Twitter
Shawn Connally
Managing Editor
| Twitter
Goli Mohammadi
Associate Managing Editor
Kip Kay
Weekend Projects
| AIM | Twitter
Collin Cunningham
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Flaherty
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
John Baichtal
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Why advertise on MAKE?
Read what folks are saying about us!
Click here to advertise on MAKE!
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Help | Write for MAKE | Contact Us | Subscribe | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy| About MAKE | FAQ
© 2010 O'Reilly Media, Inc.
All trademarks and registered trademarks appearing on makezine.com are the property of their respective owners.
RSS
the very first comment in that blog provides the update.. It's not a D3, it is just a dismantled Nikon Coolpix S60.
Reply to this comment
The commend about the s60 is linking to another article ins0mniac
Reply to this comment
I can't pick out what it is based on the image, especially since I don't know cheap cameras. But a D3 has a totally different shape and does not say Nikon along the left side.
The Nikon D3 is a $5000 camera body. I would hope it's not a D3, even broken. It's also a thing of beauty, if you've never handled one you really should.
Reply to this comment
I looked up the Nikon product page for the D3: http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3/index.htm
You can easily tell the cut camera does not look remotely like the D3.
The coolpix S60 is a compact point and shoot, so it's not an S60 either.
I'm very familiar with Nikon's bodies, I've owned about 6 over the years and it doesn't look like a Nikon to me. I found a page with a lot of Nikon images here http://www.pbase.com/cameras/nikon but I don't see anything like this camera on there either.
Reply to this comment
It's a D3 on its side, gentlemen.
Reply to this comment
@Silverman - You're right. Thanks for clearing it up. :) I was wondering why the "left grip" had what looked like a prism in it and why the "side" of the lens have the printing that should be on the bottom. But I still didn't make the connection.
It's an impressive shot, but I cringe to see a D3 like that.
I'll go to bed before I embarrass myself any more tonight.
Reply to this comment
I took that picture myself during the Eco Products fair in Tokyo in December last year. It is Nikon D3 sliced in half (probably with a a water jet or a laser cutter, I imagine that the lens elements were taken out and cut seperately as you wouldn't ever use the same machine to cut glass and metal the same way). The reason you might not see it is because it looks like a horisontal cut while in reality it is a vertical cut.
The mentioning of a Coolpix S60 is just to compare the lenses of the two different pictures.
I haven't yet contacted Nikon about it, since I didn't imagine that this blog post would get noticed at all. But I am honored to be picked up on the MAKEZINE blog. It is my favorite blog!
Reply to this comment
The d3 is an amazing camera. This one was amazing until somebody ruthlessly chopped it in half.
Reply to this comment
it's an air brush painting. Skill full and often done.
Reply to this comment
... and the lens is a Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 G.
Reply to this comment
Nah, these cutaways are made with a special kind of saw. The blade is made with a soft metal, which forms the matrix for embedded carborundum particles. Just like a tile saw. The trick is to saw very slowly, more slowly and smoothly than a human can, using a stepper (or like) motor and a slide.
Reply to this comment
How do you recognize the lense? I just knew it wasn't a VR lense because of the print on the bottom.
They should have cut a Canon in half, it wouldn't have made the camera any worse. (Sorry, had to say it).
Reply to this comment
My company has made such cutaways. It's not as simple or cool as you'd imagine. First a line is marked for cutting, then the product is taken apart and rough cut, usually with a bandsaw or mill--glass would take something different, obviously. Then the parts are sanded up to the line and sometimes polished or painted. Then they are reassembled and mounted to a display board.
Reply to this comment