RFID racing and the environment

shoeRFID012209_1.jpg
shoeRFID012209_2.jpg

Kevin, of Race Day Nutrition, writes:

RFID devices have found a niche in the sports timing world. Instead of handheld stopwatches or velcro transponders, racers now strap an RFID to their shoelaces. Race logistics are greatly improved, but at what cost? What is the environmental impact of 10,000 trashed RFIDs after a big city marathon?

He's looking for input and ideas from the environmental and DIY communities on reuse and recycling of these tags.

RFID race timing vs. the environment


Recent Entries

Comments

Oldest comments listed first.

Posted by: Rich on January 22, 2009 at 1:40 PM

reusable tags

I was under the impression some race timing companies let a runner buy a reusable chip. So you buy a little shoelace fob and that's your RFID for every race you run. Certainly much more environmentally friendly if they're reused.


Posted by: Max on January 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Bigger trash

If they don't use RFID tags they will use number bibs, a bigger piece of trash. Get some perspective.


Posted by: wha on January 22, 2009 at 1:52 PM

@Rich... they may end up with compatibility issues from one race to another...

@Max... true.

seems like a race organizer could use a collection box at the end of the race for the used tags. even if you get *most* of them back you are way ahead in reducing waste and cost for next years event.


Posted by: Anonymous on January 22, 2009 at 1:54 PM

The New York Road Runners Club collects and reuses their chips every race OR you can purchase your own as was already pointed out.


Posted by: blubrick on January 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM

So many solutions, such a small problem

Reusable tags have already been suggested.

You could have the entrants pay a fully refundable deposit of, say $10, on disposable tags. Even if the runners themselves don't want their ten bucks back, I'm sure there are plenty of people who would be willing to collect the tags for that sort of refund money. Charities could set up bins at the finish line for runners to put their used tags into.

Or you could make a rule that the entrants can't get their times until they hand back their tags.


Posted by: Anonymous on January 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM

I've been hankering to play around with the RFID tags used in local runs since I started last year, but they collect them all at the end of every race. You want your finisher's shirt, medal, certificate, whatever - you gotta hand the tag over.

I'm curious the relative waste between a printed runner's bib and an RFID tag - sure, the bib is larger, but between the chip and the antenna, wouldn't the tag use more resources over the whole of it's manufacture?


Posted by: HURF DURF on January 23, 2009 at 6:26 AM

Oh my F****** GAIA

Let me point out the fact that races have, as numbnuts define it, a HORRENDOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.

First everybody has to DRIVE to the events and then DRIVE home. CO2 out the ASS.

Next, whenever you have tons of people standing around you end up with PILES OF TRASH. Not to mention the precious, irreplaceable resources used to create and produce those disposable items and then the vehicles that have to haul them off to the garbage dump or recycling center.

Grass trampled under foot by people milling about like cattle, horrendous food vendors causing vast increases in local methane, ELECTRICITY EVERYWHERE, Light polution (camera flashes!)... The list goes ON AND ON AND ON.

And you're concerned about the "environmental impact" of a piece of paper with some copper on it?

Are you ******* insane?

STOP RACES NOW. Its obvious that this human activity is COMPLETELY WORTHLESS when compared to its environmental impact.

Do everybody a favor and STAY HOME. With the lights out. Holding in as much CO2 as possible.

******* idiots.


Posted by: Anonymous on January 23, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Hurf Durf...

At first I was all :-\
Then I was like :D


Posted by: brk on January 24, 2009 at 9:27 AM

If this site had a comment voting mechanism I would upvote Hurf Durfs comment. Twice.


Posted by: John on January 28, 2009 at 3:38 PM

John

Hmm, certain commenters here smell like RFID industry folks avoiding the issue.


Leave a comment


Subscribe to MAKE!Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.

$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

Subscribe now


Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!


CRAFT Maker Shed Maker Faire MAKE television




Check out more videos from MAKE.

MZ_Jameco-RobotBuild_RR.gif
MZ_DIYMovieMaking-RR.gif
Maker SHED

Connect with MAKE

Be a MAKE fan on Facebook MAKE on Facebook
Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE!
MAKE on Twitter MAKE on Twitter
Follow our MAKE tweets!
MAKE Flickr Pool MAKE on Flickr
Join our MAKE Flickr Pool!
    make_tips on Twitter



    MAKE Archives

    Make: Money

    Make: Science Room
    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Make: Online editors and authors!

    Gareth BranwynGareth Branwyn
    Editor-in-Chief


    Phillip TorronePhillip Torrone
    Senior Editor
    | Web | Twitter


    Becky SternBecky Stern
    Associate Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Marc de VinckMarc de Vinck
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John ParkJohn Park
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Sean RaganSean Ragan
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Matt MetsMatt Mets
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    Dale DoughertyDale Dougherty
    Editor & Publisher
    | Twitter


    Shawn ConnallyShawn Connally
    Managing Editor
    | Twitter


    Goli MohammadiGoli Mohammadi
    Associate Managing Editor

    Kip KayKip Kay
    Weekend Projects
    | AIM | Twitter


    Collin CunninghamCollin Cunningham
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter

    Adam FlahertyAdam Flaherty
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John BaichtalJohn Baichtal
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter



    More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)

    Suggest a Site!

    Advertise here with FM.

    Why advertise on MAKE?
    Read what folks are saying about us!

    Click here to advertise on MAKE!



    Current Podcast

    itunesdl.gif Weekend Project: Pinhole Panoramic Camera A sturdy, panoramic design pinhole camera that uses 120 film. Thanks go to Ross Orr for the original article in MAKE Volume 09. To download The Pinhole Panoramic Camera video video click here and subscribe in iTunes. Check out... More...

    Get the Make: Online sent via email
    Enter your email to receive Make: Online each day:



    Sign up for the Make: Newsletter

    Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.


     



    MAKE Fascination video series brought to you by Dow

    Make: Education
    MAKE: en EspaƱol MAKE: Japan
    Important please read


    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Recent Posts from the Craft: Blog