The lost transistor?

adamscrystalamp.jpg

While conducting historical research for the recent MAKE presents: The Transistor video, I came across references to an earlier iteration of the device apparently created way back in 1933 - a full 14 years before Bell Labs researchers had a working model. What makes the discovery even more compelling and inspiring is the fact that its inventor, Robert Adams, was only 13 years old when he made it. Though no patents or publications were created describing its functionality, Adams is said to have built multiple crystal radios utilizing the device. Though Dr. Robert George Adams passed away in 2006, his website documents some of his work -

200904020920.jpg

Two different methods of interconnection between the two crystals were employed -

1. By copper wire from a crystal mounted in a crystal cup, the other end of which is connected to the crystal set proper.
2. By direct physical contact (under small pressure) in an assembly of two crystal cup holders with vertical mounting brackets secured to a small insulated base board.

Connections to this small module of two crystals was achieved with the use of the then available vertical cantilever type cats whisker holders, providing stable connections to the central junction and input and output points. The words 'emitter', 'base', 'collector' hadn't yet been born for this new device, which, of course, was destined to become known today as a "transistor".

Inspired by Adams' story and my experience building a homebrew LED, I've begun experimenting with carborundum to create my own point-contact transistor. As I'm sure readers out there have more experience in the field of crystal detectors and similar, I'd love to hear of any ideas/experiences/opinions regarding DIY transistors in general - be sure to share any you may have in the comments below.


Recent Entries

Comments

Oldest comments listed first.

Posted by: UptownGreen on April 2, 2009 at 6:50 AM

An important distinction needs to be made here- the Bell labs folks didn't invent the first transistor, they invented the first bipolar junction transistor.

The functionality of the transistor was well understood by then- what the guys at Bell did was to make a semiconductor device that did it.


Posted by: Collin Cunningham on April 2, 2009 at 7:26 AM

Thanks much for the insight!
I was referring, in particular, to the point-contact device constructed by Walter Brattain and John Bardeen - not William Shockley's Bipolar Junction Transistor which was developed subsequently. However, there does still stand a fundemental difference between Brattain&Bardeen's device in comparison to Adams - the former apparently utilizes 2 layers of doped semiconductor, while the latter apparently only uses the raw crystal.


Posted by: bill beaty on April 2, 2009 at 12:22 PM

WOW, GOOD FIND!

Yay! I'd heard about that "two-whisker detector," but never found anything online about it.

One issue: if the whiskers are too far apart, or if its bias polarities are wrong, then it's not a transistor, but instead is just a battery-biased rectifier (with zero Vf turn-on voltage, so it picks up much weaker signals.) I know the old amateurs had battery-biased detectors, but they applied the voltage to the two terminals rather than having a transistor-like device.

I found an old book of conference papers on the Bell Labs transistor discovery, and one of the papers was about making cats-whisker transistors from Galena. Very useful for anyone attempting this.

The experimenters found that in order to see some gain and start "transisting," the whisker-tips had to be spaced far closer than 0.1mm. They also found that it only worked using freshly-cleaved Galena surfaces, and humidity would spoil the transistor effect after awhile. Also, they found that they first had to obtain a good, reliable base-emitter diode, but after that most any crude collector-base contact would give transistor action. Apparently it's not necessary to find TWO close-spaced hot spots on the crystal, only one. Finally, they created extremely sharp whiskers by dissolving the ends using electrolysis. I've seen this done for STM... the etching at the water surface will eat the metal faster, so when the submerged part breaks off, yank the rest out of contact with the bath.


Posted by: Vladimir on April 2, 2009 at 7:24 AM

I once built a radio like this...

... they were sold in Mexico in kit form by a company that sold all kinds of science toys. This was almost 20 years ago, I wonder if they are still in business, they were called "Myalegria" which means something like "my joy".

I can't remember many details but it was very simple, it shouldn't be difficult to make one.

Anyways, Google can't find anything about Myalegria, I wonder if they really existed...


Posted by: Collin Cunningham on April 2, 2009 at 7:41 AM

Do you mean a basic crystal radio set?


Posted by: DV82XL on April 2, 2009 at 8:19 AM

If you look in the PW Crystal Experimenters Handbook of 1925 (link below)

http://earlywireless.com/pdf/pw_xtal_experimenters_hdbk.pdf

Not only will you find descriptions of amplification with 'radio crystals' but the odd oscillator circuit as well.

It would seem that these effects were well known, at least in amateur radio circles.


Posted by: Collin Cunningham on April 2, 2009 at 9:34 AM

Awesome - thanks for the link!

I was aware of some references to crystals used by naval electricians as oscillators, but not specifically for amplification


Posted by: DB on April 2, 2009 at 10:49 AM

I love finding old technology articles like this. Thanks for posting the pdf link.


Posted by: Dave on April 2, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Primitive Transistors/Amplifying Devices

Do a search on Oleg V. Lossev (and variations, such as "O.V. Lossev"). He had a solid state amplifying device in the 1920s/30s. Unfortunately, he seems to have disappeared in the Battle of Stalingrad (probably, literally, in a flash). :-(

There is also some evidence that Greenleaf Whittier Pickard invented what would become the tunnel diode, as reported in QST magazine, March, 1920, page 44 (members only):

http://p1k.arrl.org/cgi-bin/topdf.cgi?id=2794&pub=qst

There are also anecdotal stories of three terminaled "crystal diodes" that produced amplifying action even earlier. Could some of these people have discovered what would become the point contact BJT?

There is also a Yahoo group devoted to home produced transistors, and which references a "Practical Wireless"
article from the 1950s on how to make a transistor at home:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/home_transistor/

Dave


Posted by: anachrocomputer on April 2, 2009 at 4:12 PM

Crystal Fire

There's a very good book on the subject of the invention of the transistor: Crystal Fire by Michael Riordan and Lillian Hoddeson. They mention that part of the reason why Bell Labs pressed ahead with the patents for the bipolar transistor was that the earlier patent (1920s) covered the field-effect transistor, and would have been considered "prior art" for the FET. Development of the FET then happened later, after the initial work on junction transistors, first in germanium and later in silicon. The book also describes how the researchers at Bell Labs first understood the physics of the transistor, and hence the need for extremely pure germanium and silicon. The innovative method of "zone refining" was a crucial part of the technology of semiconductors.


Posted by: Hiro Protagonist on April 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM

Homebrew semiconductors

This guy documents some interesting modern-day experiments with homebrewing unconventional amplification and negative resistance devices, such as zinc oxide based amplifiers, and even an alcohol-flame triode:
http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/


Posted by: Gareth Branwyn on April 2, 2009 at 11:07 PM

This is a great, Collin. I want to do an installment of my Lost Knowledge column on experiments in making your own electronic components, inspired by your LED video. So, if anyone has decent links to homemade Leyden jars, tunnel diodes, triodes, homemade transistors, coils, condensers, conductors, etc., post 'em here.

Does anyone have Pete Friedrichs' book Voice of the Crystal? Is it any good? I've tried emailing him several times and never heard back. The images on his website are amazing:
http://www.hpfriedrichs.com/index.htm


Posted by: HP Friedrichs on August 21, 2009 at 5:00 PM

Reply to Gareth Brandwn comments dated April 2, 2009

To Gareth Brandwyn:

Gareth, I'm always glad to hear from fellow experimenters, so I answer *all* emails. If I didn't answer you, it's only because I didn't get your messages.

Truth be told, I have had some problems in recent months with my ISP interpreting incoming emails from certain domains as spam. You can reach me through the email address on my web site. If that doesn't work, you might try sending from a different mail account.

Regards,

H.P. "Pete" Friedrichs
AC7ZL
www.hpfriedrichs.com


Leave a comment


Subscribe to MAKE!Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.

$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

Subscribe now


Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!


CRAFT Maker Shed Maker Faire Makers Market




Check out more videos from MAKE.



MZ_MakeProjectsLibrary-RR.gif

Makezine: July is for Kids!
Makezine: MAKEcation
MZ_MakeAndMend-RR.gif


Connect with MAKE

Be a MAKE fan on Facebook MAKE on Facebook
Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE!
MAKE on Twitter MAKE on Twitter
Follow our MAKE tweets!
MAKE Flickr Pool MAKE on Flickr
Join our MAKE Flickr Pool!
    make_tips on Twitter



    MAKE Archives

    Makers Market
    Maker SHED
    Make: Science Room
    MZ_MakingDetroit-RR.gif

    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Make: Online editors and authors!

    Gareth BranwynGareth Branwyn
    Editor-in-Chief


    Phillip TorronePhillip Torrone
    Senior Editor
    | Web | Twitter


    Becky SternBecky Stern
    Associate Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Marc de VinckMarc de Vinck
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John ParkJohn Park
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Sean RaganSean Ragan
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Matt MetsMatt Mets
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    Dale DoughertyDale Dougherty
    Editor & Publisher
    | Twitter


    Shawn ConnallyShawn Connally
    Director of
    Digital Media
    | Twitter


    Goli MohammadiGoli Mohammadi
    Senior Editor


    Kip KayKip Kay
    Weekend Projects
    | AIM | Twitter


    Collin CunninghamCollin Cunningham
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter

    Adam FlahertyAdam Flaherty
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John BaichtalJohn Baichtal
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter



    More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)

    Suggest a Site!

    Advertise here with FM.

    Why advertise on MAKE?
    Read what folks are saying about us!

    Click here to advertise on MAKE!



    Current Podcast

    itunesdl.gif Weekend Project: CD/DVD Parts Container A cheap and easy way to organize parts of all sizes. Thanks go to Steve Stofiel for the original article in MAKE, Volume 23. To download The CD/DVD Parts Container video click here and subscribe in iTunes. Check out... More...

    Get the Make: Online sent via email
    Enter your email to receive Make: Online each day:



    Sign up for the Make: Newsletter

    Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.


     



    Make: Education
    MAKE: en EspaƱol MAKE: Japan
    Important please read


    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Recent Posts from the Craft: Blog