Austin's new development at the site of the old Robert Mueller airport includes a small solar farm consisting of fifteen of these lovely blue "solar sunflower" collectors, designed by Cambridge's Harries/Héder Collaborative, whose concept was selected from a pool of 37 applicants to Austin's Art in Public Places program. Details of the project are available here. The collectors, which have been installed but aren't yet active, will collect energy during the day and release it at night as light for the nearby hike-and-bike trail.
What is really funny about this "environmental" installation is that is sits next to the frontage road which was re-directed to force you to drive through the shopping center instead of a normal route which would take you to your cross street.
That little trick by the developer (clearly designed to encourage additional shopping) will probably use more energy in a day than those solar cells will produce in their lifetime.
Clearly, this design does not maximize energy collection, so maybe the point is art? The path is badly laid out for bikes, and being gravel, shouldn't be called a bike path at all. As a recreational walking path... well, it is on the side of I35, which is not a pleasant place to walk, and Ive never seen anyone walking here. So what is the point of these things?
To say they are just decoration is too generous, as they imply something they do not deliver; sustainability. The only thing they sustain are path lights on a poorly designed trail.
What a bunch of expensive fluff, pasted to the side of the latest big-box strip mall. I predict that in the next decade, a new conservative movement will eviscerate the left for ridiculous projects like this.
Posted by: Anonymous on November 8, 2009 at 4:28 PM
INTERESTING - but not correct.
TxDoT was the cause of the rerouting, not the developer. It sucks, but kept the 51st Street/Cameron Road intersection from failing. Change may be coming, but don't expect traffic to work anytime before TxDoT redoes IH35 through this area.
And, while I'm not gaga over them, the "Sunflowers" ARE INTERESTING.
Posted by: Green guy on January 22, 2010 at 11:56 AM
installer
SOlar PV installations are not as efficient as some other renewables available. Austin Energy's best kept secret is its solar thermal program. This technology is already financially viable and over 60% efficient. Austin solar
Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Sign up for the Make: Newsletter
Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.
RSS
What is really funny about this "environmental" installation is that is sits next to the frontage road which was re-directed to force you to drive through the shopping center instead of a normal route which would take you to your cross street.
That little trick by the developer (clearly designed to encourage additional shopping) will probably use more energy in a day than those solar cells will produce in their lifetime.
Reply to this comment
Here comes the hoodlums to "teach this thing a lesson" in 3..2...1.
Reply to this comment
Anything that lines I35 in Austin is far from being considered "art"
Reply to this comment
Clearly, this design does not maximize energy collection, so maybe the point is art? The path is badly laid out for bikes, and being gravel, shouldn't be called a bike path at all. As a recreational walking path... well, it is on the side of I35, which is not a pleasant place to walk, and Ive never seen anyone walking here. So what is the point of these things?
To say they are just decoration is too generous, as they imply something they do not deliver; sustainability. The only thing they sustain are path lights on a poorly designed trail.
What a bunch of expensive fluff, pasted to the side of the latest big-box strip mall. I predict that in the next decade, a new conservative movement will eviscerate the left for ridiculous projects like this.
Reply to this comment
I think they're pretty. That's why I posted them. :)
Reply to this comment
I understand only 3 of them "lit up" last night. Was there technical problems?? Anyone know who installed the soloar panels??
Reply to this comment
TxDoT was the cause of the rerouting, not the developer. It sucks, but kept the 51st Street/Cameron Road intersection from failing. Change may be coming, but don't expect traffic to work anytime before TxDoT redoes IH35 through this area.
And, while I'm not gaga over them, the "Sunflowers" ARE INTERESTING.
Reply to this comment
SOlar PV installations are not as efficient as some other renewables available. Austin Energy's best kept secret is its solar thermal program. This technology is already financially viable and over 60% efficient. Austin solar
Reply to this comment