Dude, Where's my (Flying) Car? Part 3


Bill Gurstelle is a Contributing Editor for MAKE magazine. His most recent book is entitled Absinthe & Flamethrowers: Projects and Ruminations on the Art of Living Dangerously. You can follow Bill on his danger-quest at twitter.com/wmgurst. He is a guest Make: Online author for the month of August.


More on the Maker quest towards building a flying car....

Batting third in the flying car line up was the Mizar, a true and actual product of the Technology Underground, but it has a sad and far more tragic case history than the others.

Henry Smolinski and Hal Blake took the top half, engine, and wings from a light airplane, and placed tehm in an attachable module that fit on rails set on top of a modified 1971 Ford Pinto.

flying pinto.jpg

By melding the two disparate vehicles through a variety of attachment methods, they came up with a flying car - half Ford economy car and half high wing airplane. Initially it worked pretty well. In fact, it really did fly and as such it got a lot press (as flying cars tend to do.)

Here's a quotation, from a 1973 magazine article (Peterson's Complete Ford Book, 3rd Edition):

"Planned as a dual-use vehicle to fly long-distance travel and then operate as a conventional automobile for local surface travel, here's how the Mizar works. Equipped with its pusher-type aircraft engine, the Mitzar airframe will be kept on telescopic supports at a convenient airport. You drive the AVE-modified Pinto to the hanger and back the car under the airframe. A self-aligning track incorporated into both units makes attachment an easy job that requires less than two minutes to complete.

Structural connections are made with self-locking high-strength pins in the structurally linked track assembly and wing support connections.

The last line in that description is worth special attention. For in late 1973, Smolinski and Blake climbed aboard the Mizar prototype one last time and powered up the engines. No one knows what went on in the cockpit of the Mizar as it rolled down the runway during takeoff. But what is known is that very shortly after they left the ground, the "self locking high-strength pins" gave way and the flying car developers found themselves driving through the Southern California sky in a suddenly wingless, and decidedly non-airworthy, Ford Pinto.

The tragic death of the two principal developers resulted in the end of the Mizar project. So, still, the world awaits the first practical flying car. But there is always another one looming on the horizon, ready to take off from the technology underground and fly into the big time.

More:


Recent Entries

Comments

Oldest comments listed first.

Posted by: George M. Ewing on August 19, 2009 at 7:31 AM

If you are interested in the history of Flying Cars, get in touch
with physicist Bill Higgins at Fermilab He has a long presentation, with hundreds of slides, commentary, and original music which he has been known to perform at Science Fiction cons, etc. Very entertaining and informative, too... He also has a shorter one on the Bell rocket belt, including interviews, etc. I think he's in the directory at fnal.gov

Thanks, George M. Ewing, wa8wte@juno.com


Posted by: Big Dave on August 19, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Flying Econo Car, or gas bomb?

Isnt the Pinto the perfect choice for this project?

I mean with their reputation for exploding gas tanks combined with the "self release" system this is a contraption the Japanese Kamikaze pilots would die for.


Posted by: RocketGuy on August 19, 2009 at 10:11 AM

I feel a lot better about the current offerings...

The Terrafugia Transition is kinda oogly, but at least you don't have to worry about a car/wing separation.

Since it's designed as a roadable airplane, rather than a retrofitted car the structural integration is better.

Too bad about the aesthetics, but I'd still take it to an in-n-out burger...


Posted by: Marc Ramsey on August 19, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Did you miss the Taylor Aerocar?

Didn't see any mention:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerocar


Posted by: Silverman on August 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM

PintO-2

The back half of that vehicle strongly resembles a Cessna Skymaster/O-2. The unmodified plane has one forward-facing and one rear-facing propeller. But it isn't really designed to operate on one engine, much less take off on one. In fact, there is an FAA Airworthiness Directive from 1977 that requires a placard in the cockpit marked "DO NOT INITIATE SINGLE ENGINE TAKEOFF".


Posted by: Sean on August 19, 2009 at 8:59 PM

RE:PintO-2

I would assume the whole flying section is from a Skymaster or O-2. The tail booms connect into the wing and it would be really easy to separate from the airframe as a complete unit including the short funky struts...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/Cessna_Skymaster_O-2_3.jpg

I've been around a few experimental aircraft builds. "Self-locking high-strength pins", Brrrrr!!!


Leave a comment


Subscribe to MAKE!Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.

$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

Subscribe now


Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!


CRAFT Maker Shed Maker Faire MAKE television
Holiday Gift Guides from MAKE
Gifts for Dads
Science and Chemistry
Gifts Under $20
More guides: Santa Claus Machines, Geek Toys for Grown Up Girls & Boys


Check out all of the episodes of Make: television

Alex Rider Dream Gadget Contest
Make: Science Room

Connect with MAKE

Be a MAKE fan on Facebook MAKE on Facebook
Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE!
MAKE on Twitter MAKE on Twitter
Follow our MAKE tweets!
MAKE Flickr Pool MAKE on Flickr
Join our MAKE Flickr Pool!
    make_tips on Twitter




    Maker SHED

    Advertise here with FM.

    Why advertise on MAKE?
    Read what folks are saying about us!

    Click here to advertise on MAKE!



    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Make: Online authors!

    Gareth BranwynGareth Branwyn
    Senior Editor


    Phillip TorronePhillip Torrone
    Senior Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Becky SternBecky Stern
    Associate Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Marc de VinckMarc de Vinck
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John ParkJohn Park
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Sean RaganSean Ragan
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Matt MetsMatt Mets
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    Dale DoughertyDale Dougherty
    Editor & Publisher
    | Twitter


    Shawn ConnallyShawn Connally
    Managing Editor
    | Twitter


    Goli MohammadiGoli Mohammadi
    Associate Managing Editor

    Kip KayKip Kay
    Weekend Projects
    | AIM | Twitter


    Collin CunninghamCollin Cunningham
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter

    Adam FlahertyAdam Flaherty
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter



    More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)

    Suggest a Site!

    Current Podcast

    itunesdl.gif Weekend Project: Beetlebot Simple robot from your parts bin that avoids obstacles. Thanks go to Jerome Demers for the original article in MAKE, Volume 12. To download the Beetlebot video, click here or subscribe in iTunes. Check out the complete Beetlebot article... More...

    Get the Make: Online sent via email
    Enter your email to receive Make: Online each day:



    MAKE Fascination video series brought to you by Dow

    Make: Education
    MAKE: en Español MAKE: Japan
    Important please read


    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Recent Posts from the Craft: Blog