Ask MAKE: Why do flourescent lights buzz?


Ask MAKE is a weekly column where we answer reader questions, like yours. Write them in to mattm@makezine.comor drop us a line on Twitter. We can't wait to tackle your conundrums!

flourescent_light.jpg

A few weeks ago, we looked at why dimmer switches cause incandescent light bulbs to buzz. We subsequently received a number of questions about why flourescent bulbs vibrate, such as this comment by snarkyFish:

It might be nice to have another one of these that explains why fluorescent lights / ballasts hum and buzz as well. I imagine it's a very similar explanation, but a much more complicated fix.

You are right, they do buzz for a similar reason, which is the mechanical components being vibrated by electromagnetic waves. In this case, however, it is probably not the bulb itself that buzzes, but the ballast.

Fluorescent bulbs are made up of a glass tube that is filled with a low-pressure inert gas and a small amount of mercury, have a phosphor coating on the inside, and have an electrode on each end. When a large enough voltage is applied across the electrodes, the gas begins to conduct, which allows an electric current to flow from one electrode to the other. This current causes collisions between gas molecules and the mercury, which creates UV energy that is then converted to visible light by the phosphor coating on the tube.

This is all well and good, however as the gas heats up, it's resistance goes down, which means that it becomes a better conductor and subsequently draws even more current. If this were left unchecked, the bulb would quickly heat up and self destruct, so a ballast is placed in series with the bulb to limit the current draw. There are a number of different kinds of ballast design, but the simplest one is to just use an inductor. An inductor will certainly limit the rate at which current can travel to the light, however it does so by absorbing magnetic fields into it's core. This absorption, which causes magnetostriction, is probably the source of your hum- it literally causes the inductor to expand and contract at twice the AC frequency, which creates an audible sound wave (at 120Hz in the US or 100Hz in most of Europe).

I don't think there is a safe way to fix this besides getting a new ballast. Newer ballasts use an electronic controller instead of an inductor for the ballast, so they shouldn't be susceptible to the same buzzing problem. Making your own is certainly a possibility, but as with any high-voltage project, you better know what you are doing first.

Any other tips for how to fix a buzzing fluorescent light? Let us know in the comments!

[CC licensed photo by adotjdotsmith]


Recent Entries

Comments

Oldest comments listed first.

Posted by: Bilsko on September 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM

Its essentially the same thing that happens with electrical distribution transformers (the ones you see at substations or sometimes underneath grates on city sidewalks)

Its taking place in a slightly different setup than an induction coil, but the effect of the electromagnetic waves on the metal is the same: really frequent expansion and contraction.


Posted by: Matt Mets on September 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Ah cool, that makes sense. I suppose that mechanical engineering starts to play a major part in the design of the transformers, both so that the design minimizes vibrations in the audible frequencies, and so that they don't just vibrate themselves apart after a short period. Interesting!


Posted by: Eric on September 17, 2009 at 11:41 AM

Magnetostriction is only part of the actual noise. You'd get noise also without an iron core because the coil itself vibrates. Why? The magnetic field (from the coil) acts on moving charges (current in the wire). Since the electrons are in the wire, the wire is subject to a force, and it moves.


Posted by: Ez on September 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Electronic ballast!


Posted by: Matt Mets on September 18, 2009 at 2:40 PM

Electronic ballast and the starters might make a good band name.


Posted by: peter dublin on September 17, 2009 at 1:46 PM

Another reason the ban on ordinary light bulbs is wrong

That seems another reason against the ban we have here in Europe on ordinary light bulbs
- and that is coming to the USA.

As a commenter noted above, and as you say in the article, electronic ballasts (outside dimmers) shouldn't give the buzzing
problem, but of course leaves plenty of others, not just the mercury risk, but for example the fire risk of CFLs in enclosed spaces
(more http://www.ceolas.net/#li18ex )

Another "cure" to buzzing etc is of course to use LED lights instead,
but again, that doesn't mean having to ban ordinary lights,
and the supposed savings of a ban end up marginal anyway, in an overall context.
(About the industrial politics behind banning the light bulbs
http://www.ceolas.net/#li1ax )


Posted by: nick on September 17, 2009 at 3:45 PM

Also, because the load isn't sinusoidal, you'll get a lot of harmonic content, which makes the hum louder, and with higher frequency content.

Electronic ballasts theoretically aren't audible, but I've noticed that a lot of them are. They just tend to make a super high pitched staticy hiss, instead of the familiar buzz.


Posted by: Matt Mets on September 19, 2009 at 6:26 AM

Ah, excellent point. I wonder if anyone is using them as a sound generating source to do subtractive synthesis?


Posted by: Johan on September 18, 2009 at 1:16 AM

Frequency

I recognize the low frequency hum of around 100 - 130 Hz you write about but I also usually notice a very high frequency sound from fluorescent bulbs when they are just turned on. I think the sound starts at around 15000 Hz and increases to over 17500 Hz which is the limit of what I can hear. I notice the sound at the same time as light gradually appears in the bulbs after they are turned on, the sound is quite intense but many people are not able to hear the high frequency. Can you explain this sound?


Posted by: Matt Mets on September 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM

If it only occurs when the lamp turns on, it is probably caused by the mechanism that pre-heats the gas in the lamp. For newer electronic models, the electrodes themselves act as heating elements, and I suspect that the circuitry that drives them is causing the high-frequency buzzing.


Posted by: Dave on September 18, 2009 at 7:58 AM

Fluorescent Lamp Oscillations

Try holding an oscilloscope probe up close to a fluorescent light. Some of them ring well up into the radio frequency range. I've seen some oscillations on old lamps well above 1 MHz!

The glow discharge inside the lamp is inherently non-linear and represents a negative resistance. Couple that with a fairly low resistance and distributed capacitance found in the wiring, and you have a RF oscillator.

Dave


Posted by: Matt Mets on September 18, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Ah, right! That probably means they can cause all sorts of havoc with other electronic devices that aren't properly shielded. I'll give the 'scope experiment a try next time I am in the shop.


Leave a comment


Subscribe to MAKE!Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.

$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

Subscribe now


Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!


CRAFT Maker Shed Maker Faire MAKE television
Holiday Gift Guides from MAKE
Gifts for Dads
Science and Chemistry
Gifts Under $20
More guides: Santa Claus Machines, Geek Toys for Grown Up Girls & Boys


Check out all of the episodes of Make: television

Alex Rider Dream Gadget Contest
Make: Science Room

Connect with MAKE

Be a MAKE fan on Facebook MAKE on Facebook
Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE!
MAKE on Twitter MAKE on Twitter
Follow our MAKE tweets!
MAKE Flickr Pool MAKE on Flickr
Join our MAKE Flickr Pool!
    make_tips on Twitter




    Maker SHED

    Advertise here with FM.

    Why advertise on MAKE?
    Read what folks are saying about us!

    Click here to advertise on MAKE!



    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Make: Online authors!

    Gareth BranwynGareth Branwyn
    Senior Editor


    Phillip TorronePhillip Torrone
    Senior Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Becky SternBecky Stern
    Associate Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Marc de VinckMarc de Vinck
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John ParkJohn Park
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Sean RaganSean Ragan
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Matt MetsMatt Mets
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    Dale DoughertyDale Dougherty
    Editor & Publisher
    | Twitter


    Shawn ConnallyShawn Connally
    Managing Editor
    | Twitter


    Goli MohammadiGoli Mohammadi
    Associate Managing Editor

    Kip KayKip Kay
    Weekend Projects
    | AIM | Twitter


    Collin CunninghamCollin Cunningham
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter

    Adam FlahertyAdam Flaherty
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter



    More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)

    Suggest a Site!

    Current Podcast

    itunesdl.gif Weekend Project: Beetlebot Simple robot from your parts bin that avoids obstacles. Thanks go to Jerome Demers for the original article in MAKE, Volume 12. To download the Beetlebot video, click here or subscribe in iTunes. Check out the complete Beetlebot article... More...

    Get the Make: Online sent via email
    Enter your email to receive Make: Online each day:



    MAKE Fascination video series brought to you by Dow

    Make: Education
    MAKE: en EspaƱol MAKE: Japan
    Important please read


    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Recent Posts from the Craft: Blog