Working cello made from LEGO

lego_cello.jpg

LEGO artist Nathan Sawaya built this awesome functional cello out of LEGO bricks.

Watching his build progress reminded me of how the 3d printing process looks. I hadn't really made the connection before, but if home printing really does become ubiquitous, will it obsolete our coveted LEGOs and erector sets? I can almost imagine some distant future where I explain to my grandchildren about these archaic pieces that we used to have to snap together in order to make our inventions. Strange.

Update: It seems pretty clear that this cello doesn't actually work. Thanks to Phil and tiorbinist for the in-depth analysis.

[via neatorama]


Recent Entries

Comments

Oldest comments listed first.

Posted by: Phil on September 21, 2009 at 6:35 PM

Playable vs 'Makes a Sound'

Looking at this photo...

http://www.brickartist.com/gallery/Cello5.jpg

...you can see that the finger board is stepped.

This would make it 'playable' or 'functional' only in the sense that it makes a sound, not that you could get a meaningful tune out of it. This is the reason, I suspect, that there is no actual sound of it on the video...


Posted by: Matt Mets on September 21, 2009 at 8:51 PM

Ahh, that's a good point, and the lack of sound in the video is a very good indicator that something is up. I'm mostly amazed that he could construct something out of LEGO that can withstand the tension of the strings without falling apart.


Posted by: Anonymous on September 21, 2009 at 11:43 PM

Also, if you look closely, the bowhair is made of lego, which would not resonate a string very well. And look at how much his finger is bending the A string (the rightmost in the photo). That tells me that the string is loosely draped over the bridge and fingerboard. This is very cool, but I doubt that it is playable, is the sense that it could make a sound.


Posted by: dcs on September 21, 2009 at 8:28 PM

"but if home printing really does become ubiquitous, will it obsolete our coveted LEGOs"

It will definitely make it easier to get those hard-to-find LEGO pieces.


Posted by: Matt Mets on September 21, 2009 at 11:00 PM

And raise even more questions about 'authenticity'. Is it truly a LEGO block if you print it yourself? Could anyone tell if you melted down common bricks to make the rare ones? What about re-printing vintage kits?


Posted by: John Stoner on September 21, 2009 at 10:35 PM

But...

what does it sound like?


Posted by: tiorbinist on September 27, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Not a chance

There is no chance that this cello is a playable thing. The tailpiece (black bit at the bottom) is built so strings under tension would place it under tension. Each string on the 'cello has tens of Newtons of tension, more on the A string (the one carelessly bent half-an-inch sideways, which I wouldn't care to do on any of the three in this house!) than the C string (the big one on our left, the player's right.)

The stepped neck might not be a problem, by the way, if this fellow had used some easily-available calculations and built the steps with large and small legos to get the steps to fall at natural fret positions, like a bass viola da gamba.

On the former hand, though, the bridge (the beige standy-uppy-thing between the F holes) and the nut (between the finger board and the pegbox) are flat bricks where the strings cross them. Without some angled pieces somewhere to make one edge of the bricks act as an edge, there is no chance on Earth that strings stretched over flat surfaces like that would sound, when played open.

The bow, with legos for hair, would fall apart with the pressure needed to get sound out of a cello string at tension, not to mention the steps in the 'hair', which would let it work (if at all) only in one direction. I won't say that the brick-hair wouldn't make a string sound, if the artist had worked one edge of them with high-grit sandpaper or steel wool, though. Many strange things have worked as bow-hair, including human hair, appropriately treated.

This is a visual art-work, only. And, it's clear that the artist is no cellist, from the way he holds the bow and cello.

Here is a major re-make waiting to happen: if someone reproduces this work with some serious attention to the mechanics of making a lego box that will stand the stress of real cello strings, he/she could use a real fingerboard, nut, bridge (with flattened feet) and tailpiece. After all, This artist didn't make his lego sculpture exclusively out of Legos: the strings make it impure. If you're going to accept that, then get the really necessary parts done properly (maybe use glue and drill and ream the pegbox to take real pegs, too!) and make a playable lego cello!


Leave a comment


Subscribe to MAKE!Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.

$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

Subscribe now


Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!


CRAFT Maker Shed Maker Faire MAKE television
Holiday Gift Guides from MAKE
Gifts for Dads
Science and Chemistry
Gifts Under $20
More guides: Santa Claus Machines, Geek Toys for Grown Up Girls & Boys


Check out all of the episodes of Make: television

Alex Rider Dream Gadget Contest
Make: Science Room

Connect with MAKE

Be a MAKE fan on Facebook MAKE on Facebook
Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE!
MAKE on Twitter MAKE on Twitter
Follow our MAKE tweets!
MAKE Flickr Pool MAKE on Flickr
Join our MAKE Flickr Pool!
    make_tips on Twitter




    Maker SHED

    Advertise here with FM.

    Why advertise on MAKE?
    Read what folks are saying about us!

    Click here to advertise on MAKE!



    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Make: Online authors!

    Gareth BranwynGareth Branwyn
    Senior Editor


    Phillip TorronePhillip Torrone
    Senior Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Becky SternBecky Stern
    Associate Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Marc de VinckMarc de Vinck
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John ParkJohn Park
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Sean RaganSean Ragan
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Matt MetsMatt Mets
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    Dale DoughertyDale Dougherty
    Editor & Publisher
    | Twitter


    Shawn ConnallyShawn Connally
    Managing Editor
    | Twitter


    Goli MohammadiGoli Mohammadi
    Associate Managing Editor

    Kip KayKip Kay
    Weekend Projects
    | AIM | Twitter


    Collin CunninghamCollin Cunningham
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter

    Adam FlahertyAdam Flaherty
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter



    More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)

    Suggest a Site!

    Current Podcast

    itunesdl.gif Weekend Project: Beetlebot Simple robot from your parts bin that avoids obstacles. Thanks go to Jerome Demers for the original article in MAKE, Volume 12. To download the Beetlebot video, click here or subscribe in iTunes. Check out the complete Beetlebot article... More...

    Get the Make: Online sent via email
    Enter your email to receive Make: Online each day:



    MAKE Fascination video series brought to you by Dow

    Make: Education
    MAKE: en EspaƱol MAKE: Japan
    Important please read


    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Recent Posts from the Craft: Blog