A cloud chamber is a simple device that allows you to observe the decay of radioactive materials. Here's how to make your own...
A cloud chamber is a simple device that allows you to observe the decay of radioactive materials. Here's how to make your own...
Oldest comments listed first.
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)
Check out more videos from MAKE.

| MAKE on Facebook Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE! |
|
| MAKE on Twitter Follow our MAKE tweets! |
|
| MAKE on Flickr Join our MAKE Flickr Pool! |
Gareth Branwyn
Editor-in-Chief
Phillip Torrone
Senior Editor
| Web | Twitter
Becky Stern
Associate Editor
| AIM | Twitter
Marc de Vinck
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
John Park
Contributing Writer
| Twitter
Sean Ragan
Contributing Writer
| Twitter
Matt Mets
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
Dale Dougherty
Editor & Publisher
| Twitter
Shawn Connally
Managing Editor
| Twitter
Goli Mohammadi
Associate Managing Editor
Kip Kay
Weekend Projects
| AIM | Twitter
Collin Cunningham
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Flaherty
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
John Baichtal
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Why advertise on MAKE?
Read what folks are saying about us!
Click here to advertise on MAKE!
Don't they mean Polonium? :-)
Reply to this comment
My grandfather showed me this when i was real young. We used an alcohol soaked black cloth over the dry ice, which was sitting in the lid of a jar, with the jar upside down, covering the cloth. At the right angle with the flashlight, you could see what looked like snow slowly falling from the top of the jar. We didn't have a radiation source, but this alcohol "snow" would create little explosions when hit by a cosmic particle.
Reply to this comment
The cloud chamber science girl and the weird guy made a few months back worked out better, plus it didn't need a huge slab of dry ice. At the nearby Meijer megamart, only a one hour round trip drive, it costs $20/lb for the cold stuff.
I'm curious, does it need to be synthetic alcohol because the radiation likes it better, or could grain alcohol be used too?
Reply to this comment
>I'm curious, does it need to be synthetic alcohol because the radiation likes it better, or could grain alcohol be used too?
The important thing is that it's relatively pure alcohol, and it's not so hard to obtain isopropanol in relatively pure form. Pure ethanol will work, but easily-obtained food-grade ethanol is usually diluted too much.
75% Everclear will not work, for example. I have not come across the 95% Everclear, but from what I've heard it's so-so as a cloud chamber medium. "Pure" denatured alcohol should be a good choice.
Reply to this comment
You can get a small amount of Americium from a smoke detector for a radiation source. (I think)
I had a book that showed how to connect an external electric field to the chamber to make the particles move around the field.
Cool Stuff
Reply to this comment
I love cloud chambers. You can actually see individual particles (or their trails at least)! :) This is a low tech version of the LHC detector. You can distinguish charged particles with an electric field, or easier perhaps, with a magnet. Charged particle beta decay (electrons or positrons (antimatter!)) will be affected by the field and will not have a straight path (unlike the alfa-particles). If done a certain way, their paths will be spirals. The direction it turns depends on if it's an electron (negative charge) or positron (positive charge), and the direction of the magnetic/electric field you apply (see Lorenz force on wikipedia or hyperphysics: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magfor.html#c2 ). :D
Reply to this comment
"Charged particle beta decay (electrons or positrons (antimatter!)) will be affected by the field and will not have a straight path (unlike the alfa-particles)."
Alpha particles are also charged (+2), but are far more massive (x7300), so it's correspondingly harder to make their tracks curve measurably.
Reply to this comment