How do you photograph a 300' tall tree in a dense forest with no clear sight lines? Wildlife photographer Michael Nichols did it by taking a bunch of close-ups using a special camera rig and stitching them together digitally. NPR has the full story. [via Hack-a-Day]
Posted by: nprnncbl on October 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM
beautiful!
Also see James Balog, who did this several years ago. Balog's tree portraits are fantastic, and I like how his images preserve the mosaic of photos, rather than digitally blending them all together.
Posted by: Timm Murray on October 1, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Helmets?
Great pictures, but what are the helmets for? If you're going to fall from a tree like that, you're pretty much screwed anyway after the first 20 feet or so.
Posted by: Jeff Rogers on October 1, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Yeah, this photo is a complete knock-off of James Balog's work, but the saying applies, "often imitated, never duplicated." James's photos of the redwoods are far better than this nick nichols shot. I just don't know how he could steal the same idea.
Ideas are seldom (if ever) unique. It's quite possible to get the same or similar idea independently of someone else.
Just look at how many of the Nobel prices that are shared because different people have made the same discoveries independently at the same time around the globe.
A mosaic of a tree isn't an all that spectacular idea, even if the results are.
Posted by: M. D. Vaden of Oregon on October 25, 2009 at 9:12 AM
Nichols image as good as Balog
The Balog images are not really better than the Nichols one, and Balog used an established method too. Either way, both are fine, and I'd like to get prints from both men's work someday when I move my office to a bigger space. The challenging part in this work is the access, weather and light. Most photographers have their hands full trying to get just one good image of part of a redwood. Let alone dozens of images. The redwood in the Nat Geo magazine only provides a lower trunk shot from the ground. The branching of the stems seen in the image is not visible from anywhere on the forest floor.
Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Sign up for the Make: Newsletter
Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.
Also see James Balog, who did this several years ago. Balog's tree portraits are fantastic, and I like how his images preserve the mosaic of photos, rather than digitally blending them all together.
Reply to this comment
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/0402/exclusive.html
Reply to this comment
Great pictures, but what are the helmets for? If you're going to fall from a tree like that, you're pretty much screwed anyway after the first 20 feet or so.
Reply to this comment
Helmets are helpful if the folks climbing a couple hundred feet above you happen to drop something, dislodge debris, etc.
Reply to this comment
Yeah, this photo is a complete knock-off of James Balog's work, but the saying applies, "often imitated, never duplicated." James's photos of the redwoods are far better than this nick nichols shot. I just don't know how he could steal the same idea.
Reply to this comment
Ideas are seldom (if ever) unique. It's quite possible to get the same or similar idea independently of someone else.
Just look at how many of the Nobel prices that are shared because different people have made the same discoveries independently at the same time around the globe.
A mosaic of a tree isn't an all that spectacular idea, even if the results are.
Reply to this comment
The Balog images are not really better than the Nichols one, and Balog used an established method too. Either way, both are fine, and I'd like to get prints from both men's work someday when I move my office to a bigger space. The challenging part in this work is the access, weather and light. Most photographers have their hands full trying to get just one good image of part of a redwood. Let alone dozens of images. The redwood in the Nat Geo magazine only provides a lower trunk shot from the ground. The branching of the stems seen in the image is not visible from anywhere on the forest floor.
Cheers,
M. D. Vaden of Oregon
Reply to this comment