Interesting article in the Telegraph about "Argleton," a town that appears in Google maps but does not, apparently, exist in the real world. The best theory I've heard is that the town is a "trap" intended to catch those who steal map data. [Thanks, Glen!]
Posted by Sean Michael Ragan |
Nov 5, 2009 08:48 AM
Computers, GPS, Online, Transportation |
Permalink
| Comments (17)
| Email This |
| Digg this!
Oldest comments listed first.
Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!
Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.
$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)
Check out more videos from MAKE.
 |
MAKE on Facebook Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE! |
 |
MAKE on Twitter Follow our MAKE tweets! |
 |
MAKE on Flickr Join our MAKE Flickr Pool! |
Gareth Branwyn
Editor-in-Chief
Phillip Torrone
Senior Editor
| Web | Twitter
Becky Stern
Associate Editor
| AIM | Twitter
Marc de Vinck
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
John Park
Contributing Writer
| Twitter
Sean Ragan
Contributing Writer
| Twitter
Matt Mets
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
Dale Dougherty
Editor & Publisher
| Twitter
Shawn Connally
Managing Editor
| Twitter
Goli Mohammadi
Associate Managing Editor
Kip Kay
Weekend Projects
| AIM | Twitter
Collin Cunningham
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Flaherty
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
John Baichtal
Contributing Writer
| AIM | Twitter
More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)
Why advertise on MAKE?
Read what folks are saying about us!
Click here to advertise on MAKE!
Behind the Scenes at MAKE and CRAFT
In January, many of the remote MAKE/CRAFT team members (myself included) convened at the Maker Media headquarters at O'Reilly Media in Sebastopol, California. Take a look behind the scenes of your favorite DIY publications as Goli Mohammadi gives us...
More...
Help | Write for MAKE | Contact Us | Subscribe | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy| About MAKE | FAQ
© 2010 O'Reilly Media, Inc.
All trademarks and registered trademarks appearing on makezine.com are the property of their respective owners.
RSS
The locals have been looking at it, it's probably more likely an OCR mis-transcription of the nearly Aughton. what's amusing everyone is the number of spongers who hooked into it without realising the place doesn't exist, selling everything from real estate to medical services, the ultimate shysters.
Reply to this comment
Well, I worked for the US Census a long time ago and ran into something similar to this a number of times. Had place names that did not exist or entire neighborhoods that did not exist.
If you contact local zoning/planning/county seats for detailed maps of an area, they often include planning maps for sub-divisions that have been platted, but not built yet. In the US, TIGER maps from the US Census Bureau is littered with a lot of that sort of thing. I could see something similar happening in England.
Reply to this comment
On second thought..
I bet the Aughton explanation is correct. Maybe OCR.. or maybe an alternate spelling. A lot of towns in England did not standardize their name spelling under the mid 19th century
Reply to this comment
It may also be a remnant of a formerly independent town, now either incorporated into a larger town or city, or no longer extant. These traces of old towns, now neighborhoods, seem to remain in the maps.
For example, search Google Maps for "Burbank, CA" and you will find the city near Los Angeles. Search again for "Burbank near San Jose, CA" and you will find such a remnant. There are a few landmarks nearby that recall the old location, notably the Burbank Theater...
Reply to this comment
Maybe its leftover test code and data a Google codemonkey accidentally left in place.
Reply to this comment
wiki it. first heard about them in a fred saberhagen berserker story.
Reply to this comment
You can create interesting words from the letters in "Argleton" ... not real, not legal, ...
Reply to this comment
The first I ran into this type of issue was listening to the Weather Channel track a Thunderstorm/Tornado near where I grew up. A number of town names were mentioned that I had never heard of before. Looking at Google maps now they aren't on the map, but you can still search and it will zoom to where they were. Bing maps has the most of these old towns, Yahoo maps shows less of them. Wadsworth, KS is one example
Reply to this comment
It's likely a paper town, see the entry on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_townsite
Mapmakers have been inserting them into their products for years to protect against copyright infringement. Agloe, New York is one of the most common ones: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agloe,_New_York
Very cool, if indeed google uses them!
Reply to this comment
Happens all the time with Google Maps. You zoom in on your own neighborhood, you'll find all sorts of neigbhorhood names, "squares," etc. that don't exist.
Reply to this comment
There's a few of those orphan towns around here. Not a big deal really. Suprised this has made the National News - must be slow...
Reply to this comment
Ugh. I don't like fake entries on maps, and I hope Google isn't deliberately using them. Google does license map data from commercial providers, however, and it's possible the paper towns come from there.
Of course, Satellite and Street View goes a long way to debunk fake road entries :)
Reply to this comment
There is one like that in NM: Agua Fria. There was a ghost town with that name, but it is a mile or so from where Maps puts it. There are only really small ruins now.
Reply to this comment
possibly a vanished town. try Bradish Nebraska. it still comes up in the Google earth data but has not existed for about 50 years. this used to be the nearest town to the farm my father grew up and where they shopped. It was a regular town with stores a railroad station churches etc. Today it is a corn field as shown on Google earth.
Reply to this comment
About a year ago, on Google Maps, Iola, TX appears as "Lola, TX." Looking at it on Google Maps now, it is no longer labeled "Lola"-- it's actually not labeled at all!
This leads me to believe that, like "Lola," "Argleton" was just a typo.
Reply to this comment
These kinds of town are indeed traps for data thiefs. I was involved in creating some of them for navigation maps of AND (Automotive navigation data) maps which google uses at certain resolution. If similar towns/roads were detected in maps created by another vendor, its clearly theft. These are just artificial vector diagrams/places and not real towns. So i think that should explain it.
Reply to this comment
I found a Google maps error when planning to attend a ham radio flea market in Deerfield NH.
Google maps locates Deerfield NH in the middle of the White Mountain national forest when in reality it is in southern NH, northeast of Manchester. Bing and yahoo maps locate it properly
Reply to this comment