How-To: Build your own field camera

top7_pic3.jpg

top6_pic3.gif

British camera restorer Rayment Kirby has a cool tutorial on how (and why) to make your own antique-style field camera from wood and brass. Mr. Kirby seems to follow the convention that the "Field" of "field camera" is an eponym and should be capitalized, whereas the Wikipedia article does not. Can anyone clarify? Was there a "Mr. Field?" Or a "Mrs. Field?" (Please, no cookie jokes.) [Thanks, Billy!]


Recent Entries

Comments

Oldest comments listed first.

Posted by: alandove on December 17, 2009 at 4:36 PM

For Use in The Field

My understanding was that a "field camera" was so called to distinguish it from a "studio camera." The former folds into a sturdy wooden box with no fragile parts exposed, so the lens won't break when your mule scrapes past a tree. The latter is a more finicky device that would only be used indoors. That would make it a small "f."

However, my only reference for this information is my Dad, who taught photography and worked as a wedding shooter for about 30 years. He also amassed a small but interesting collection of antique photo gear, including a couple of large-format cameras.


Posted by: Voik on December 17, 2009 at 5:21 PM

Ironically, Mr. Kirby doesn't capitalize his own name in the header of his web page.


Posted by: Stunmonkey on December 17, 2009 at 9:25 PM

I second the notion on the small "f".

The terms "field" and "studio" denote two different general categories of basic purpose and function, with a whole lot of subtypes throw in for good measure, and a lot of hybrids that might be easily considered either or both.

It is a general descriptive term, but just like the argument of exactly where "medium format" stops and "large format" begins, there isn't an exact delineation.

Pedants love eternally debating the topic on the internets. I haven't checked in to actually determine which category mine are considered to be by the 'experts', I'm too busy using them to actually take pictures.


Posted by: Eddie Edwards on December 18, 2009 at 7:01 AM

Field should be capitalized

I wondered about this - why would it be called a "field" camera?

Turns out that patent 1934178 circa 1933 by one John Field covers a camera looking suspiciously like this one.

I strongly suspect, therefore, that it is called a "Field camera" because it's the camera invented by Field.

I love old patents :)

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1934178.html

(Can't submit to Wikipedia, of course, as this is "original research".)


Posted by: alandove on December 18, 2009 at 9:49 AM

Too Late and Wrong Design

1933 is very late in the game for originating the f(F)ield camera; US Civil War photographers used field cameras more than half a century before this patent was filed. Also, the patent isn't describing what I'd call a field camera at all. Instead, it's a roll film camera that looks like it was patterned on Kodak's original Brownie. I gather Mr. Field was trying to get more exposures on a roll, using an approach that anticipates the original 8mm movie camera design: expose frames along one half of the film, then reverse the roll to expose the other half.

There are lots of people named Field, so it wouldn't be hard to cook up a rationale for naming the field camera after one of them, but in the absence of a more compelling story I'm sticking with the lowercase form.


Posted by: Rob Cruickshank on December 18, 2009 at 9:59 AM

Possibly confused with Land camera.

As a user of a camera with bellows, I'm constantly being asked if it's a Land camera. For many people, the Polaroid cameras named after Edwin Land are the only modern cameras they've seen with bellows. Perhaps people are confusing "field" with "Land", since a field is a chunk of land. It's definitely small "f" for field camera, though.

Now if people on Craigslist would just stop spelling "lens" with an "e", we'd be all set.


Posted by: http://www.flickr.com/photos/monicastewart on December 19, 2009 at 7:52 PM

Making you own large format camera (field, studio, or otherwise)

I think making your own camera is a neat idea, but having used many large format cameras, I would discourage anyone from building a camera before getting experience with large format cameras.

Unless you have actually used these cameras for some time, you don't really understand what you will need, or not need. It would be like building a custom bike when you have never ridden a bike.

When budgeting keep in mind that you need to buy a lens and film holders. Sheet film holders typically hold two sheets of film, so you'll probably want more than one. Everyone expects a lens to be expensive, but newcomers are often surprised that film holders are not cheap, and buying used sheet film holders is asking for trouble in the form of light leaks.


Leave a comment


Subscribe to MAKE!Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

Subscribe today, save 42% and get web access to MAKE free. MAKE Digital Edition is available only to subscribers.

$34.95 / 1 year
(4 Quarterly Issues)

Subscribe now


Void your warranty, violate a user agreement, fry a circuit, blow a fuse, poke an eye out. Make: The risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things... Welcome to Make: Online!


CRAFT Maker Shed Maker Faire MAKE television




Check out more videos from MAKE.

MZ_Jameco-RobotBuild_RR.gif
MZ_DIYMovieMaking-RR.gif
Maker SHED

Connect with MAKE

Be a MAKE fan on Facebook MAKE on Facebook
Visit our Facebook page and become a fan of MAKE!
MAKE on Twitter MAKE on Twitter
Follow our MAKE tweets!
MAKE Flickr Pool MAKE on Flickr
Join our MAKE Flickr Pool!
    make_tips on Twitter



    MAKE Archives

    Make: Money

    Make: Science Room
    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Make: Online editors and authors!

    Gareth BranwynGareth Branwyn
    Editor-in-Chief


    Phillip TorronePhillip Torrone
    Senior Editor
    | Web | Twitter


    Becky SternBecky Stern
    Associate Editor
    | AIM | Twitter


    Marc de VinckMarc de Vinck
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John ParkJohn Park
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Sean RaganSean Ragan
    Contributing Writer
    | Twitter


    Matt MetsMatt Mets
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    Dale DoughertyDale Dougherty
    Editor & Publisher
    | Twitter


    Shawn ConnallyShawn Connally
    Managing Editor
    | Twitter


    Goli MohammadiGoli Mohammadi
    Associate Managing Editor

    Kip KayKip Kay
    Weekend Projects
    | AIM | Twitter


    Collin CunninghamCollin Cunningham
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter

    Adam FlahertyAdam Flaherty
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter


    John BaichtalJohn Baichtal
    Contributing Writer
    | AIM | Twitter



    More contributors: Mark Frauenfelder (Editor-in-Chief, MAKE magazine), Kipp Bradford (Technical Consultant/Writer), Chris Connors (Education), Diana Eng (Guest Author), Peter Horvath (Intern), Brian Jepson (O'Reilly Media), Robert Bruce Thompson (Science Room)

    Suggest a Site!

    Advertise here with FM.

    Why advertise on MAKE?
    Read what folks are saying about us!

    Click here to advertise on MAKE!



    Current Podcast

    itunesdl.gif John Park in the Maker Shed: tinyCylon kit build They let me loose in the Maker Shed, so I grabbed a tinyCylon Kit, built it, and embedded it in a busted Nerf gun! More...

    Get the Make: Online sent via email
    Enter your email to receive Make: Online each day:



    Sign up for the Make: Newsletter

    Our Make: Newsletter covers news from maker Media, has original columns, Shed deals, and more! You can also read the archives of past issues.


     



    MAKE Fascination video series brought to you by Dow

    Make: Education
    MAKE: en EspaƱol MAKE: Japan
    Important please read


    Subscribe to MAKE Magazine!

    Recent Posts from the Craft: Blog