15 Responses to Make: Ultimate Guide to 3D Printing

1. Calin Brabandt on November 23rd, 2012 at 3:50 pm said:

   This issue is quite comprehensive. The Buyer’s Guide actually contains the most comprehensive review of consumer / hobby 3D printers that I’ve ever seen! Good work!

   However, The 4-5/5 score for Ultimaker “Print Quality” is unexpectedly low (I think a “5″ is in order and consistent with the “5″ for “Accuracy”), but perhaps 4-5 score is due to a problem with the reviewers. Sometimes reviewers expect “magic” or “mind reading” products to replace intelligent user interaction:

   “The snake and owl came out great, but the torture test had lots of stringing, mainly due to Cura’s default settings not having retraction turned on.”

   There are advantageous and disadvantageous to using retraction. That’s the nature of settings; you can’t have them both (all) ways in the same universe at the same time!

   Reply ↓
2. Erich on November 24th, 2012 at 7:26 pm said:

   It would have been better if the machines were used by pro-users to really compair the best the printers can output, compairing default settings isn’t much of a comparison but helps a bit in choosing which printer I would buy.

   It would have been nice to have big pictures of the torture test print, they only have a tiny picture of each in the summery and the clear ones are very hard to see.

   Reply ↓
3. steve on December 14th, 2012 at 2:22 pm said:

   Im crying FOUL here…..I’ve got a bit of a problem with the midrange standouts – (and i’ve only concentrated the midgrange 3d printers because thats my area of intrest in a purchase)

   According to the test results, the MAKERGEAR M2 equals or out scores the TYPE A SERIES 1 in all areas but reliability (for which there is no explinationas to why it got a 1 point reduction in that area in the review) the overall scores of the M2 are higher then the A1

   . …. this is either and obvious mistake in stating the standouts. or clear bias.,

   Notably, all the price point class winners happen to all be sold at makershed where as the point leader in class is not sold my makershed. This makes it seem more like bias for things makershed sells.

   There are ovbious drawbacks in flexability on the A1,
   its inability to print abs because it has no heated bed, calling it “optimised for PLA” nice way to discribe a missing feature. honestly sounds more like ther marketing department wrote that.

   the A1 also is lacking an sd slot, but again seemed not to play into a final recomedation

   The A1′s lack fo documentation on the website were M2 has documentation of the website, but they scored the same for documentation. thats another odd observation.

   i know i am concsentrating on a comparison to the M2 which to my eyes seems to be the best in class according to the reviews and the scoring, but the drawbacks of the A1 seem to have been glossed over, glorified as features, or down right ignored.

   The review also has no reall easy way to compare the printers side by side, showing sores on one page, ore ven totaling of the scores would have been helpful. Seems also practily, there should ahve been a catagory for veratility.

   a table of scores, and featrue comparisons would have been ideal.

   I have to commend this effort for having enough information to then research and do a final decision. my problem is with the conclusions not matching the scoring and some of the biased writing.

   .

   Reply ↓

   • Erich on December 14th, 2012 at 3:16 pm said:

     There is bias as each tester has experience in 3D printers, any scores would be effected by what printers they have used or own. It’s also not clear if the score came from a single tester or a group averaged out (but a lack of decimal point hints at only one tester).

     Reply ↓
   • Tony on January 2nd, 2013 at 5:09 pm said:

     One thing that should be noted was that the M2 was reviewed by its owner because MAKE couldn’t get their hands on a machine for testing. People tend to view things they already own more favorably and this bias will come out in a review. Personally, I think it more likely that the M2 review is biased than the A1 based purely on the review process.

     Reply ↓

     • steve on January 22nd, 2013 at 6:59 am said:

       I’m not sure how you can say that.
       lets take a practical look at the advantages each has over the other
       type a series 1 chasses is made of plywood wood and the m2 stainless steel, a1 has no heated bed, limiting its abilities in printing abs, m2 can has a heated bed and can print both pla and abs well. a1 can print down to 100 microns and the m2 can print to 20 microns. a1 doesn’t have documentation of their website – web site is sparse, m2 does have docs. a1 can not print without a pc, m2 can as it has an sd card slot. a1 print volume 729 cu in. and the m2 640 cu in, a1 build speed is 80mm/s and m2 is 150mm/s., price at the time of writing was within 100 dollars of each other fully assembled.
       m2 out classes the a1 in all respects except for total print volume and then only slightly. maybe i missed something. if so point it out. print quality speaks for itself, and with tweaking i am sure both printers could do better.
       now I am no m2 fan boy. I actually own a makerbot replicator dual extruder at the moment which I am perfectly happy with. but lets call a spade a spade ok. shame on the editors not to point these things out properly.

       Reply ↓
4. James Norris on December 27th, 2012 at 9:43 am said:

   Our wifi printer that isn’t working, and I need to find a new one. Thanks for sharing this.

   Reply ↓
5. krenza on January 25th, 2013 at 2:28 am said:

   looks really nice! I actually made a little hypercube sculpture up for print over at http://www.shapeways.com/model/887892

   I never thought possible though at a 3D printer ever would print ceramics! got some REALLY nice appetizer spoons at http://www.shapeways.com/model/888574

   Reply ↓
6. Bill on January 27th, 2013 at 11:12 pm said:

   It would be so much better if you put prices next to the descriptions.

   Reply ↓
7. dorothy on March 11th, 2013 at 8:51 am said:

   I really can’t wait for an updated guide on 3D printing like this in the next couple of years, It’ll be nice to look at an issue like this once a year and see the differences and advances. Kinda like when you look back at specs and prices for a PC in the last 10-20 years and see we were paying A LOT more for A LOT less.

   Reply ↓
8. Dental medicine cad/ Cam and the prices for evry single object ,such as ; 3Dprinting, Microsoft , Scannars, etc; on March 12th, 2013 at 5:01 pm said:

   I can,t wait for an updated guide on on 3D printing has to do with medical – Dental lab,s

   Reply ↓
9. carteles on March 13th, 2013 at 2:43 am said:

   3D printers are the future, technology moves very quickly, in a short time we will have 3d printers to fabricate objects and even food.

   Reply ↓
10. mari on April 22nd, 2013 at 2:02 pm said:

    in the future we will do everything with this type of printers, from objects up to food.excellent post,thanks for sharing.

    Reply ↓

    • prestamos rapidos on April 30th, 2013 at 1:15 am said:

      not is what will be the future, but everything happens by doing more comfortable life to people, thanks to technology

      Reply ↓
11. Megan on May 13th, 2013 at 1:51 am said:

    why would people be buying the stuff in 3D for ?

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.